Component comparison
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce MX350
- + Release year (+1)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+2 MHz)
- + Die size (mm²) (+313 mm²)
- + Energy efficiency (+8.0)
B
GeForce RTX 2060
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+280 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+95 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+7,500M)
- + CUDA cores (+1280)
- + TMUs (+88)
- + ROPs (+32)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+5.25 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+57.15 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+154.62 GTexel/s)
- + PassMark (overall) (+11276)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+4805)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+11960)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+58300)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+52489)
- + Normalized score (+35.6)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce MX350
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2020 (+1) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 2 GB | 6 GB (+4 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1752 MHz (+2 MHz) | 1750 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 56 GB/s | 336 GB/s (+280 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 192 bit (+128 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 20 W | 115 W (+95 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 14 nm | 12 nm (-2 nm) |
| Transistors (M) | 3,300M | 10,800M (+7,500M) |
| Die size (mm²) | 132 mm² (+313 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | 1354 MHz | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1468 MHz | — |
| CUDA cores | 640 | 1,920 (+1280) |
| TMUs | 32 | 120 (+88) |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 (+32) |
| RT cores | — | 30 |
| Tensor cores | — | 240 |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 1.20 TFLOPS | 6.45 TFLOPS (+5.25 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 23.49 GPixel/s | 80.64 GPixel/s (+57.15 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 46.98 GTexel/s | 201.60 GTexel/s (+154.62 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 26.1 (+8.0) | 18.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 2,818 | 14,094 (+11276) |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,336 | 6,141 (+4805) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 4,371 | 16,331 (+11960) |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 13,112 | 71,412 (+58300) |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 13,369 | 65,858 (+52489) |
| Normalized score | 30.8 | 66.4 (+35.6) |
Only in component B
DLSS
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2060 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anno 1800 | 19 FPS | 61 FPS | 221.1% (B) |
| Apex Legends | 28 FPS | 105 FPS | 275% (B) |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey | 12 FPS | 68 FPS | 466.7% (B) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 6 FPS | 53 FPS | 783.3% (B) |
| Battlefield 5 | 37 FPS | 104 FPS | 181.1% (B) |
| Borderlands 3 | 17 FPS | 61 FPS | 258.8% (B) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War | 10 FPS | 62 FPS | 520% (B) |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | 21 FPS | 74 FPS | 252.4% (B) |
| Control | 12 FPS | 54 FPS | 350% (B) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 66 FPS | 150 FPS | 127.3% (B) |
| Crysis Remastered | 9 FPS | 53 FPS | 488.9% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16 FPS | 60 FPS | 275% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | 7 FPS | 45 FPS | 542.9% (B) |
| Darksiders III | 31 FPS | 103 FPS | 232.3% (B) |
| Days Gone | 24 FPS | 87 FPS | 262.5% (B) |
| Death Stranding | 17 FPS | 92 FPS | 441.2% (B) |
| Dirt 5 | 7 FPS | 59 FPS | 742.9% (B) |
| Dirt Rally 2.0 | 34 FPS | 113 FPS | 232.4% (B) |
| Dota 2 | 83 FPS | 118 FPS | 42.2% (B) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 32 FPS | 121 FPS | 278.1% (B) |
| F1 2019 | 28 FPS | 122 FPS | 335.7% (B) |
| F1 2020 | 33 FPS | 126 FPS | 281.8% (B) |
| F1 2021 | 31 FPS | 126 FPS | 306.5% (B) |
| FIFA 20 | 46 FPS | 111 FPS | 141.3% (B) |
| FIFA 21 | 88 FPS | 163 FPS | 85.2% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 27 FPS | 96 FPS | 255.6% (B) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 25 FPS | 77 FPS | 208% (B) |
| Farming Simulator 19 | 49 FPS | 151 FPS | 208.2% (B) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 11 FPS | 52 FPS | 372.7% (B) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 9 FPS | 42 FPS | 366.7% (B) |
| Fortnite | 82 FPS | 162 FPS | 97.6% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 37 FPS | 108 FPS | 191.9% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 25 FPS | 100 FPS | 300% (B) |
| GRID 2019 | 18 FPS | 65 FPS | 261.1% (B) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 46 FPS | 95 FPS | 106.5% (B) |
| Gears Tactics | 30 FPS | 93 FPS | 210% (B) |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint | 15 FPS | 74 FPS | 393.3% (B) |
| Hitman 2 | 20 FPS | 81 FPS | 305% (B) |
| Hitman 3 | 19 FPS | 105 FPS | 452.6% (B) |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12 FPS | 67 FPS | 458.3% (B) |
| Hunt Showdown | 21 FPS | 75 FPS | 257.1% (B) |
| Immortals Fenyx Rising | 10 FPS | 54 FPS | 440% (B) |
| Just Cause 4 | 26 FPS | 82 FPS | 215.4% (B) |
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance | 23 FPS | 83 FPS | 260.9% (B) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 19 FPS | 60 FPS | 215.8% (B) |
| Metro Exodus | 12 FPS | 56 FPS | 366.7% (B) |
| Monster Hunter World | 21 FPS | 90 FPS | 328.6% (B) |
| Need for Speed Heat | 23 FPS | 63 FPS | 173.9% (B) |
| Outriders | 22 FPS | 90 FPS | 309.1% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rage 2 | 15 FPS | 73 FPS | 386.7% (B) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18 FPS | 65 FPS | 261.1% (B) |
| Resident Evil Village | 14 FPS | 95 FPS | 578.6% (B) |
| Rocket League | 67 FPS | 181 FPS | 170.1% (B) |
| Serious Sam 4 | 4 FPS | 58 FPS | 1350% (B) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 25 FPS | 122 FPS | 388% (B) |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | 19 FPS | 66 FPS | 247.4% (B) |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 50 FPS | 173 FPS | 246% (B) |
| The Division 2 | 20 FPS | 74 FPS | 270% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 27 FPS | 111 FPS | 311.1% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 21 FPS | 74 FPS | 252.4% (B) |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 12 FPS | 67 FPS | 458.3% (B) |
| Valorant | 129 FPS | 223 FPS | 72.9% (B) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 13 FPS | 66 FPS | 407.7% (B) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 30 FPS | 56 FPS | 86.7% (B) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 20 FPS | 72 FPS | 260% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 2060 wins 18 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).