Component comparison

GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 2050

GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 2050 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce MX350
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+2 MHz)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+68 mm²)
  • + Base clock (MHz) (+619 MHz)
  • + Boost clock (MHz) (+223 MHz)
B GeForce RTX 2050
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+56 GB/s)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+25 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+5,400M)
  • + CUDA cores (+1408)
  • + TMUs (+32)
  • + ROPs (+16)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+3.53 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+16.35 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+32.70 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+3.5)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+1885)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+4594)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+31167)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+29661)
  • + Normalized score (+24.4)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce MX350
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2050
Release year 2020 2021 (+1)
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 4 GB (+2 GB)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1752 MHz (+2 MHz) 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 56 GB/s 112 GB/s (+56 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 64 bit 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 20 W 45 W (+25 W)
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 8 nm (-6 nm)
Transistors (M) 3,300M 8,700M (+5,400M)
Die size (mm²) 132 mm² (+68 mm²) 200 mm²
Base clock (MHz) 1354 MHz (+619 MHz) 735 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) 1468 MHz (+223 MHz) 1245 MHz
CUDA cores 640 2,048 (+1408)
TMUs 32 64 (+32)
ROPs 16 32 (+16)
RT cores — 32
Tensor cores — 64
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 1.20 TFLOPS 4.73 TFLOPS (+3.53 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 23.49 GPixel/s 39.84 GPixel/s (+16.35 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 46.98 GTexel/s 79.68 GTexel/s (+32.70 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 26.1 29.6 (+3.5)
PassMark (overall) 2,818 —
3DMark Time Spy 1,336 3,221 (+1885)
3DMark Fire Strike 4,371 8,965 (+4594)
Geekbench OpenCL 13,112 44,279 (+31167)
Geekbench Vulkan 13,369 43,030 (+29661)
Normalized score 30.8 55.2 (+24.4)

Only in component B

DLSS ReBAR

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce MX350 GeForce RTX 2050 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 8 FPS 21 FPS 162.5% (B)
Armored Core 6 10 FPS 32 FPS 220% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 6 FPS 21 FPS 250% (B)
Atomic Heart 7 FPS 30 FPS 328.6% (B)
Back 4 Blood 29 FPS 66 FPS 127.6% (B)
Baldur's Gate 3 11 FPS 30 FPS 172.7% (B)
Battlefield 5 37 FPS ≈ 70 FPS 89.2% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS ≈ 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 14 FPS 18 FPS 28.6% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 66 FPS ≈ 74 FPS 12.1% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 31 FPS 46 FPS 48.4% (B)
Crysis Remastered 9 FPS 25 FPS 177.8% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 16 FPS 18 FPS 12.5% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 6 FPS 19 FPS 216.7% (B)
Days Gone 24 FPS 45 FPS 87.5% (B)
Dead Island 2 21 FPS 31 FPS 47.6% (B)
Death Stranding 17 FPS 50 FPS 194.1% (B)
Deathloop 7 FPS 30 FPS 328.6% (B)
Diablo 4 27 FPS 39 FPS 44.4% (B)
Dota 2 83 FPS 71 FPS +16.9% (A)
Elden Ring 15 FPS 39 FPS 160% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 32 FPS 70 FPS 118.8% (B)
F1 2021 31 FPS 66 FPS 112.9% (B)
F1 22 20 FPS 55 FPS 175% (B)
F1 23 14 FPS 37 FPS 164.3% (B)
Far Cry 5 27 FPS 35 FPS 29.6% (B)
Far Cry 6 11 FPS 43 FPS 290.9% (B)
Farming Simulator 22 32 FPS 63 FPS 96.9% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 11 FPS 25 FPS 127.3% (B)
Flight Simulator 2020 9 FPS 19 FPS 111.1% (B)
Fortnite 82 FPS ≈ 95 FPS 15.9% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 37 FPS ≈ 70 FPS 89.2% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 25 FPS 53 FPS 112% (B)
GRID Legends 25 FPS 61 FPS 144% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS ≈ 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 46 FPS 74 FPS 60.9% (B)
Gears Tactics 30 FPS 55 FPS 83.3% (B)
Ghostwire Tokyo 15 FPS 51 FPS 240% (B)
Hitman 3 19 FPS 59 FPS 210.5% (B)
Hunt Showdown 21 FPS 54 FPS 157.1% (B)
Lies of P 19 FPS 29 FPS 52.6% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 19 FPS 39 FPS 105.3% (B)
Metro Exodus 12 FPS ≈ 35 FPS 191.7% (B)
Monster Hunter Stories 2 57 FPS 90 FPS 57.9% (B)
Outriders 22 FPS 34 FPS 54.5% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS ≈ 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS ≈ 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 18 FPS 66 FPS 266.7% (B)
Ready or Not 32 FPS 75 FPS 134.4% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18 FPS 17 FPS +5.9% (A)
Resident Evil Village 14 FPS 58 FPS 314.3% (B)
Riders Republic 15 FPS 38 FPS 153.3% (B)
Serious Sam 4 4 FPS 32 FPS 700% (B)
Sons of the Forest 13 FPS 34 FPS 161.5% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 50 FPS 111 FPS 122% (B)
The Finals 17 FPS 68 FPS 300% (B)
The Quarry 11 FPS 31 FPS 181.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 27 FPS ≈ 58 FPS 114.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 21 FPS 47 FPS 123.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 7 FPS 19 FPS 171.4% (B)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 8 FPS 38 FPS 375% (B)
Total War Pharaoh 23 FPS 30 FPS 30.4% (B)
Valorant 129 FPS ≈ 130 FPS 0.8% (B)
Vampire Bloodhunt 35 FPS 73 FPS 108.6% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 13 FPS 39 FPS 200% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 30 FPS 59 FPS 96.7% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 20 FPS 43 FPS 115% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings. Values for GeForce RTX 2050 are model predictions (≈); GeForce MX350 are direct measurements.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 2050 wins 18 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews