Component comparison
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce MX350
- + Release year (+1)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+252 MHz)
- + Die size (mm²) (+152 mm²)
- + Energy efficiency (+1.3)
B
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+232 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+60 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+3,300M)
- + CUDA cores (+896)
- + TMUs (+64)
- + ROPs (+32)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+2.90 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+61.47 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+122.92 GTexel/s)
- + PassMark (overall) (+9800)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+4323)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+10447)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+47799)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+44761)
- + Normalized score (+32.9)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce MX350
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2020 (+1) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 2 GB | 6 GB (+4 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1752 MHz (+252 MHz) | 1500 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 56 GB/s | 288 GB/s (+232 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 192 bit (+128 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 20 W | 80 W (+60 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 14 nm | 12 nm (-2 nm) |
| Transistors (M) | 3,300M | 6,600M (+3,300M) |
| Die size (mm²) | 132 mm² (+152 mm²) | 284 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | 1354 MHz | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1468 MHz | — |
| CUDA cores | 640 | 1,536 (+896) |
| TMUs | 32 | 96 (+64) |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 (+32) |
| RT cores | — | — |
| Tensor cores | — | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 1.20 TFLOPS | 4.10 TFLOPS (+2.90 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 23.49 GPixel/s | 84.96 GPixel/s (+61.47 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 46.98 GTexel/s | 169.90 GTexel/s (+122.92 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 26.1 (+1.3) | 24.9 |
| PassMark (overall) | 2,818 | 12,618 (+9800) |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,336 | 5,659 (+4323) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 4,371 | 14,818 (+10447) |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 13,112 | 60,911 (+47799) |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 13,369 | 58,130 (+44761) |
| Normalized score | 30.8 | 63.7 (+32.9) |
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce MX350 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 8 FPS | 45 FPS | 462.5% (B) |
| Anno 1800 | 19 FPS | 69 FPS | 263.2% (B) |
| Apex Legends | 28 FPS | 102 FPS | 264.3% (B) |
| Armored Core 6 | 10 FPS | 64 FPS | 540% (B) |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey | 12 FPS | 69 FPS | 475% (B) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 6 FPS | 49 FPS | 716.7% (B) |
| Atomic Heart | 7 FPS | 50 FPS | 614.3% (B) |
| Back 4 Blood | 29 FPS | 126 FPS | 334.5% (B) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 11 FPS | 54 FPS | 390.9% (B) |
| Battlefield 5 | 37 FPS | 111 FPS | 200% (B) |
| Borderlands 3 | 17 FPS | 62 FPS | 264.7% (B) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War | 10 FPS | 68 FPS | 580% (B) |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | 21 FPS | 88 FPS | 319% (B) |
| Control | 12 FPS | 51 FPS | 325% (B) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 66 FPS | 147 FPS | 122.7% (B) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 31 FPS | 104 FPS | 235.5% (B) |
| Crysis Remastered | 9 FPS | 55 FPS | 511.1% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16 FPS | 86 FPS | 437.5% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | 7 FPS | 47 FPS | 571.4% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 6 FPS | 54 FPS | 800% (B) |
| Darksiders III | 31 FPS | 75 FPS | 141.9% (B) |
| Days Gone | 24 FPS | 83 FPS | 245.8% (B) |
| Dead Island 2 | 21 FPS | 86 FPS | 309.5% (B) |
| Death Stranding | 17 FPS | 88 FPS | 417.6% (B) |
| Deathloop | 7 FPS | 66 FPS | 842.9% (B) |
| Diablo 4 | 27 FPS | 113 FPS | 318.5% (B) |
| Dirt 5 | 7 FPS | 56 FPS | 700% (B) |
| Dirt Rally 2.0 | 34 FPS | 107 FPS | 214.7% (B) |
| Dota 2 | 83 FPS | 121 FPS | 45.8% (B) |
| Elden Ring | 15 FPS | 57 FPS | 280% (B) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 32 FPS | 117 FPS | 265.6% (B) |
| F1 2019 | 28 FPS | 121 FPS | 332.1% (B) |
| F1 2020 | 33 FPS | 122 FPS | 269.7% (B) |
| F1 2021 | 31 FPS | 120 FPS | 287.1% (B) |
| F1 22 | 20 FPS | 117 FPS | 485% (B) |
| F1 23 | 14 FPS | 109 FPS | 678.6% (B) |
| FIFA 20 | 46 FPS | 181 FPS | 293.5% (B) |
| FIFA 21 | 88 FPS | 214 FPS | 143.2% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 27 FPS | 93 FPS | 244.4% (B) |
| Far Cry 6 | 11 FPS | 78 FPS | 609.1% (B) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 25 FPS | 79 FPS | 216% (B) |
| Farming Simulator 19 | 49 FPS | 145 FPS | 195.9% (B) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 32 FPS | 121 FPS | 278.1% (B) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 11 FPS | 55 FPS | 400% (B) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 9 FPS | 39 FPS | 333.3% (B) |
| Fortnite | 82 FPS | 120 FPS | 46.3% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 37 FPS | 134 FPS | 262.2% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 25 FPS | 107 FPS | 328% (B) |
| GRID 2019 | 18 FPS | 91 FPS | 405.6% (B) |
| GRID Legends | 25 FPS | 118 FPS | 372% (B) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 46 FPS | 124 FPS | 169.6% (B) |
| Gears Tactics | 30 FPS | 90 FPS | 200% (B) |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint | 15 FPS | 70 FPS | 366.7% (B) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 15 FPS | 89 FPS | 493.3% (B) |
| Hitman 2 | 20 FPS | 82 FPS | 310% (B) |
| Hitman 3 | 19 FPS | 99 FPS | 421.1% (B) |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12 FPS | 70 FPS | 483.3% (B) |
| Hunt Showdown | 21 FPS | 69 FPS | 228.6% (B) |
| Immortals Fenyx Rising | 10 FPS | 59 FPS | 490% (B) |
| Just Cause 4 | 26 FPS | 73 FPS | 180.8% (B) |
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance | 23 FPS | 77 FPS | 234.8% (B) |
| Lies of P | 19 FPS | 77 FPS | 305.3% (B) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 19 FPS | 67 FPS | 252.6% (B) |
| Metro Exodus | 12 FPS | 54 FPS | 350% (B) |
| Monster Hunter Stories 2 | 57 FPS | 134 FPS | 135.1% (B) |
| Monster Hunter World | 21 FPS | 82 FPS | 290.5% (B) |
| Need for Speed Heat | 23 FPS | 80 FPS | 247.8% (B) |
| Outriders | 22 FPS | 84 FPS | 281.8% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rage 2 | 15 FPS | 70 FPS | 366.7% (B) |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 18 FPS | 105 FPS | 483.3% (B) |
| Ready or Not | 32 FPS | 101 FPS | 215.6% (B) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18 FPS | 75 FPS | 316.7% (B) |
| Resident Evil Village | 14 FPS | 99 FPS | 607.1% (B) |
| Riders Republic | 15 FPS | 55 FPS | 266.7% (B) |
| Rocket League | 67 FPS | 209 FPS | 211.9% (B) |
| Serious Sam 4 | 4 FPS | 67 FPS | 1575% (B) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 25 FPS | 114 FPS | 356% (B) |
| Sons of the Forest | 13 FPS | 55 FPS | 323.1% (B) |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | 19 FPS | 85 FPS | 347.4% (B) |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 50 FPS | 159 FPS | 218% (B) |
| The Callisto Protocol | 10 FPS | 81 FPS | 710% (B) |
| The Division 2 | 20 FPS | 78 FPS | 290% (B) |
| The Finals | 17 FPS | 99 FPS | 482.4% (B) |
| The Quarry | 11 FPS | 56 FPS | 409.1% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 27 FPS | 103 FPS | 281.5% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 21 FPS | 93 FPS | 342.9% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 7 FPS | 43 FPS | 514.3% (B) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 8 FPS | 67 FPS | 737.5% (B) |
| Total War Pharaoh | 23 FPS | 82 FPS | 256.5% (B) |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 12 FPS | 64 FPS | 433.3% (B) |
| Valorant | 129 FPS | 209 FPS | 62% (B) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 35 FPS | 124 FPS | 254.3% (B) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 13 FPS | 71 FPS | 446.2% (B) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 30 FPS | 64 FPS | 113.3% (B) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 20 FPS | 74 FPS | 270% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti wins 18 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).