Component comparison

GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce MX350
  • + Release year (+4)
  • + Energy efficiency (+10.4)
B GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+56 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+55 W)
  • + CUDA cores (+128)
  • + TMUs (+16)
  • + ROPs (+16)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+0.98 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+21.05 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+19.84 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+3545)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+925)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+3114)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+7542)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+6421)
  • + Normalized score (+10.0)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce MX350
 Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Release year 2020 (+4) 2016
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 4 GB (+2 GB)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 1752 MHz —
Bandwidth (GB/s) 56 GB/s 112 GB/s (+56 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 64 bit 128 bit (+64 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 20 W 75 W (+55 W)
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 14 nm
Transistors (M) 3,300M 3,300M
Die size (mm²) 132 mm² 132 mm²
Base clock (MHz) 1354 MHz —
Boost clock (MHz) 1468 MHz —
CUDA cores 640 768 (+128)
TMUs 32 48 (+16)
ROPs 16 32 (+16)
RT cores — —
Tensor cores — —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 1.20 TFLOPS 2.18 TFLOPS (+0.98 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 23.49 GPixel/s 44.54 GPixel/s (+21.05 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 46.98 GTexel/s 66.82 GTexel/s (+19.84 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 26.1 (+10.4) 15.8
PassMark (overall) 2,818 6,363 (+3545)
3DMark Time Spy 1,336 2,261 (+925)
3DMark Fire Strike 4,371 7,485 (+3114)
Geekbench OpenCL 13,112 20,654 (+7542)
Geekbench Vulkan 13,369 19,790 (+6421)
Normalized score 30.8 40.8 (+10.0)

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce MX350 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Delta
Anno 1800 19 FPS 39 FPS 105.3% (B)
Apex Legends 28 FPS 43 FPS 53.6% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 12 FPS 31 FPS 158.3% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 6 FPS 15 FPS 150% (B)
Battlefield 5 37 FPS 57 FPS 54.1% (B)
Borderlands 3 17 FPS 28 FPS 64.7% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 10 FPS 22 FPS 120% (B)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 21 FPS 36 FPS 71.4% (B)
Control 12 FPS 22 FPS 83.3% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 66 FPS 70 FPS 6.1% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 16 FPS 27 FPS 68.8% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 6 FPS 17 FPS 183.3% (B)
Darksiders III 31 FPS 45 FPS 45.2% (B)
Death Stranding 17 FPS 36 FPS 111.8% (B)
Deathloop 7 FPS 21 FPS 200% (B)
Dirt 5 7 FPS 19 FPS 171.4% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 34 FPS 45 FPS 32.4% (B)
Dota 2 83 FPS 98 FPS 18.1% (B)
Elden Ring 15 FPS 26 FPS 73.3% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 32 FPS 45 FPS 40.6% (B)
F1 2019 28 FPS 63 FPS 125% (B)
F1 2020 33 FPS 63 FPS 90.9% (B)
F1 22 20 FPS 48 FPS 140% (B)
FIFA 20 46 FPS 154 FPS 234.8% (B)
FIFA 21 88 FPS 142 FPS 61.4% (B)
Far Cry 5 27 FPS 48 FPS 77.8% (B)
Far Cry 6 11 FPS 29 FPS 163.6% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 25 FPS 42 FPS 68% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 49 FPS 77 FPS 57.1% (B)
Farming Simulator 22 32 FPS 46 FPS 43.8% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 11 FPS 23 FPS 109.1% (B)
Flight Simulator 2020 9 FPS 17 FPS 88.9% (B)
Fortnite 82 FPS 75 FPS +9.3% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 37 FPS 67 FPS 81.1% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 25 FPS 40 FPS 60% (B)
GRID 2019 18 FPS 34 FPS 88.9% (B)
GRID Legends 25 FPS 42 FPS 68% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 46 FPS 60 FPS 30.4% (B)
Gears Tactics 30 FPS 49 FPS 63.3% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 15 FPS 35 FPS 133.3% (B)
Ghostwire Tokyo 15 FPS 33 FPS 120% (B)
Hitman 2 20 FPS 30 FPS 50% (B)
Hitman 3 19 FPS 40 FPS 110.5% (B)
Horizon Zero Dawn 12 FPS 31 FPS 158.3% (B)
Hunt Showdown 21 FPS 34 FPS 61.9% (B)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 10 FPS 23 FPS 130% (B)
Just Cause 4 26 FPS 35 FPS 34.6% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 23 FPS 38 FPS 65.2% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 19 FPS 33 FPS 73.7% (B)
Metro Exodus 12 FPS 31 FPS 158.3% (B)
Monster Hunter World 21 FPS 33 FPS 57.1% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 23 FPS 42 FPS 82.6% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 15 FPS 32 FPS 113.3% (B)
Rainbow Six Extraction 18 FPS 42 FPS 133.3% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18 FPS 24 FPS 33.3% (B)
Riders Republic 15 FPS 29 FPS 93.3% (B)
Rocket League 67 FPS 106 FPS 58.2% (B)
Serious Sam 4 4 FPS 22 FPS 450% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25 FPS 31 FPS 24% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 19 FPS 47 FPS 147.4% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 50 FPS 85 FPS 70% (B)
The Division 2 20 FPS 35 FPS 75% (B)
The Quarry 11 FPS 24 FPS 118.2% (B)
The Witcher 3 27 FPS 46 FPS 70.4% (B)
The Witcher 3 21 FPS 21 FPS ≈
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 8 FPS 24 FPS 200% (B)
Valorant 129 FPS 110 FPS +17.3% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 35 FPS 58 FPS 65.7% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 13 FPS 27 FPS 107.7% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 30 FPS 44 FPS 46.7% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 20 FPS 33 FPS 65% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti wins 16 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews