Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro T1000

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+30 W)
  • + CUDA cores (+768)
  • + Energy efficiency (+0.7)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+6105)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+27061)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+28405)
  • + Normalized score (+17.8)
B Quadro T1000
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+6500 MHz)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
 Component B
Quadro T1000
Release year 2019 2019
VRAM (GB) 6 GB (+2 GB) 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz 8000 MHz (+6500 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 288 GB/s —
Memory bus (bit) 192 bit (+64 bit) 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 80 W (+30 W) 50 W
Lithography (nm) 12 nm 12 nm
Transistors (M) 6,600M —
Die size (mm²) 284 mm² —
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — 1455 MHz
CUDA cores 1,536 (+768) 768
TMUs 96 —
ROPs 48 —
RT cores — —
Tensor cores — —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 4.10 TFLOPS —
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 84.96 GPixel/s —
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 169.90 GTexel/s —
Energy efficiency 24.9 (+0.7) 24.1
PassMark (overall) 12,618 (+6105) 6,513
3DMark Time Spy 5,659 —
3DMark Fire Strike 14,818 —
Geekbench OpenCL 60,911 (+27061) 33,850
Geekbench Vulkan 58,130 (+28405) 29,725
Normalized score 63.7 (+17.8) 45.9

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Quadro T1000 Delta
Anno 1800 69 FPS 37 FPS +86.5% (A)
Apex Legends 102 FPS 58 FPS +75.9% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 69 FPS 35 FPS +97.1% (A)
Battlefield 5 111 FPS 38 FPS +192.1% (A)
Borderlands 3 62 FPS 38 FPS +63.2% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 88 FPS 51 FPS +72.5% (A)
Control 51 FPS 31 FPS +64.5% (A)
Dirt Rally 2.0 107 FPS 64 FPS +67.2% (A)
Doom Eternal 133 FPS 64 FPS +107.8% (A)
Dota 2 121 FPS 113 FPS +7.1% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 117 FPS 68 FPS +72.1% (A)
F1 2019 121 FPS 61 FPS +98.4% (A)
FIFA 19 256 FPS 114 FPS +124.6% (A)
FIFA 20 181 FPS 160 FPS +13.1% (A)
Far Cry 5 93 FPS 57 FPS +63.2% (A)
Far Cry New Dawn 79 FPS 46 FPS +71.7% (A)
Farming Simulator 19 145 FPS 86 FPS +68.6% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 55 FPS 31 FPS +77.4% (A)
For Honor 120 FPS 64 FPS +87.5% (A)
GRID 2019 91 FPS 65 FPS +40% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 124 FPS 94 FPS +31.9% (A)
Gears Tactics 90 FPS 58 FPS +55.2% (A)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 70 FPS 47 FPS +48.9% (A)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 79 FPS 44 FPS +79.5% (A)
Hunt Showdown 69 FPS 44 FPS +56.8% (A)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 77 FPS 41 FPS +87.8% (A)
Metro Exodus 54 FPS 32 FPS +68.8% (A)
Need for Speed Heat 80 FPS 52 FPS +53.8% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 70 FPS 46 FPS +52.2% (A)
Rainbow Six Siege 201 FPS 112 FPS +79.5% (A)
Red Dead Redemption 2 51 FPS 30 FPS +70% (A)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 86 FPS 53 FPS +62.3% (A)
Rocket League 209 FPS 117 FPS +78.6% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114 FPS 40 FPS +185% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 85 FPS 58 FPS +46.6% (A)
The Division 2 78 FPS 36 FPS +116.7% (A)
The Witcher 3 93 FPS 53 FPS +75.5% (A)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 64 FPS 38 FPS +68.4% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 64 FPS 57 FPS +12.3% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti wins 9 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews