Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+161 mm²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+7.8)
B GeForce RTX 2070
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+160 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + Transistors (M) (+4,200M)
  • + CUDA cores (+768)
  • + TMUs (+48)
  • + ROPs (+16)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+1.36 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+18.74 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+63.40 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+3445)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+1002)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+8368)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+27526)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+25278)
  • + Normalized score (+6.8)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
Release year 2019 (+1) 2018
VRAM (GB) 6 GB 8 GB (+2 GB)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz —
Bandwidth (GB/s) 288 GB/s 448 GB/s (+160 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 192 bit 256 bit (+64 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 80 W 80 W
Lithography (nm) 12 nm 12 nm
Transistors (M) 6,600M 10,800M (+4,200M)
Die size (mm²) 284 mm² (+161 mm²) 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 1,536 2,304 (+768)
TMUs 96 144 (+48)
ROPs 48 64 (+16)
RT cores — 36
Tensor cores — 288
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 4.10 TFLOPS 5.46 TFLOPS (+1.36 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 84.96 GPixel/s 103.70 GPixel/s (+18.74 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 169.90 GTexel/s 233.30 GTexel/s (+63.40 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 24.9 (+7.8) 17.0
PassMark (overall) 12,618 16,063 (+3445)
3DMark Time Spy 5,659 6,661 (+1002)
3DMark Fire Strike 14,818 23,186 (+8368)
Geekbench OpenCL 60,911 88,437 (+27526)
Geekbench Vulkan 58,130 83,408 (+25278)
Normalized score 63.7 70.5 (+6.8)

Only in component B

DLSS

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce RTX 2070 Delta
Anno 1800 69 FPS 69 FPS ≈
Anthem 73 FPS 84 FPS 15.1% (B)
Apex Legends 102 FPS 128 FPS 25.5% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 69 FPS 84 FPS 21.7% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 49 FPS 69 FPS 40.8% (B)
Battlefield 5 111 FPS 92 FPS +20.7% (A)
Borderlands 3 62 FPS 71 FPS 14.5% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 112 FPS 135 FPS 20.5% (B)
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 68 FPS 81 FPS 19.1% (B)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 88 FPS 113 FPS 28.4% (B)
Control 51 FPS 68 FPS 33.3% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 147 FPS 150 FPS 2% (B)
Crysis Remastered 55 FPS 71 FPS 29.1% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 86 FPS 60 FPS +43.3% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 47 FPS 62 FPS 31.9% (B)
Darksiders III 75 FPS 99 FPS 32% (B)
Days Gone 83 FPS 101 FPS 21.7% (B)
Death Stranding 88 FPS 115 FPS 30.7% (B)
Deus Ex Mankind Divided 79 FPS 103 FPS 30.4% (B)
Dirt 5 56 FPS 69 FPS 23.2% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 107 FPS 117 FPS 9.3% (B)
Dishonored 2 100 FPS 117 FPS 17% (B)
Doom 144 FPS 184 FPS 27.8% (B)
Doom Eternal 133 FPS 149 FPS 12% (B)
Dota 2 121 FPS 127 FPS 5% (B)
ELEX 90 FPS 119 FPS 32.2% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 117 FPS 119 FPS 1.7% (B)
F1 2018 126 FPS 152 FPS 20.6% (B)
F1 2019 121 FPS 139 FPS 14.9% (B)
F1 2020 122 FPS 146 FPS 19.7% (B)
F1 2021 120 FPS 139 FPS 15.8% (B)
FIFA 19 256 FPS 287 FPS 12.1% (B)
FIFA 20 181 FPS 190 FPS 5% (B)
FIFA 21 214 FPS 211 FPS +1.4% (A)
Far Cry 5 93 FPS 103 FPS 10.8% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 79 FPS 91 FPS 15.2% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 145 FPS 162 FPS 11.7% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 55 FPS 77 FPS 40% (B)
Flight Simulator 2020 39 FPS 49 FPS 25.6% (B)
For Honor 120 FPS 156 FPS 30% (B)
Fortnite 120 FPS 122 FPS 1.7% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 134 FPS 121 FPS +10.7% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 107 FPS 85 FPS +25.9% (A)
GRID 2019 91 FPS 104 FPS 14.3% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 124 FPS 127 FPS 2.4% (B)
Gears Tactics 90 FPS 115 FPS 27.8% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 70 FPS 89 FPS 27.1% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 79 FPS 99 FPS 25.3% (B)
Hitman 2 82 FPS 86 FPS 4.9% (B)
Hitman 3 99 FPS 124 FPS 25.3% (B)
Horizon Zero Dawn 70 FPS 85 FPS 21.4% (B)
Hunt Showdown 69 FPS 101 FPS 46.4% (B)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 59 FPS 72 FPS 22% (B)
Just Cause 4 73 FPS 96 FPS 31.5% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 77 FPS 97 FPS 26% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 67 FPS 90 FPS 34.3% (B)
Metro Exodus 54 FPS 61 FPS 13% (B)
Middle-earth: Shadow of War 89 FPS 127 FPS 42.7% (B)
Mirror's Edge Catalyst 101 FPS 131 FPS 29.7% (B)
Monster Hunter World 82 FPS 103 FPS 25.6% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 80 FPS 84 FPS 5% (B)
Need for Speed Payback 113 FPS 141 FPS 24.8% (B)
Outriders 84 FPS 94 FPS 11.9% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Prey 143 FPS 140 FPS +2.1% (A)
Rage 2 70 FPS 103 FPS 47.1% (B)
Rainbow Six Siege 201 FPS 234 FPS 16.4% (B)
Red Dead Redemption 2 51 FPS 66 FPS 29.4% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 75 FPS 65 FPS +15.4% (A)
Resident Evil 7 147 FPS 194 FPS 32% (B)
Resident Evil Village 99 FPS 126 FPS 27.3% (B)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 86 FPS 92 FPS 7% (B)
Rocket League 209 FPS 247 FPS 18.2% (B)
Serious Sam 4 67 FPS 71 FPS 6% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114 FPS 149 FPS 30.7% (B)
Star Wars Battlefront 2 95 FPS 140 FPS 47.4% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 85 FPS 92 FPS 8.2% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 159 FPS 228 FPS 43.4% (B)
The Crew 2 60 FPS 60 FPS ≈
The Division 2 78 FPS 94 FPS 20.5% (B)
The Witcher 3 103 FPS 122 FPS 18.4% (B)
The Witcher 3 93 FPS 116 FPS 24.7% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 64 FPS 89 FPS 39.1% (B)
Valorant 209 FPS 180 FPS +16.1% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 71 FPS 82 FPS 15.5% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 64 FPS 72 FPS 12.5% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 74 FPS 96 FPS 29.7% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 2070 wins 16 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews