Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
  • + Die size (mm²) (+161 mm²)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+4.32 GPixel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+6.7)
B GeForce RTX 2060
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+48 GB/s)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+35 W)
  • + Transistors (M) (+4,200M)
  • + CUDA cores (+384)
  • + TMUs (+24)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+2.35 TFLOPS)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+31.70 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+1476)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+482)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+1513)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+10501)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+7728)
  • + Normalized score (+2.7)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
Release year 2019 2019
VRAM (GB) 6 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz 1750 MHz (+250 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 288 GB/s 336 GB/s (+48 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 192 bit 192 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 80 W 115 W (+35 W)
Lithography (nm) 12 nm 12 nm
Transistors (M) 6,600M 10,800M (+4,200M)
Die size (mm²) 284 mm² (+161 mm²) 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 1,536 1,920 (+384)
TMUs 96 120 (+24)
ROPs 48 48
RT cores — 30
Tensor cores — 240
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 4.10 TFLOPS 6.45 TFLOPS (+2.35 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 84.96 GPixel/s (+4.32 GPixel/s) 80.64 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 169.90 GTexel/s 201.60 GTexel/s (+31.70 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 24.9 (+6.7) 18.1
PassMark (overall) 12,618 14,094 (+1476)
3DMark Time Spy 5,659 6,141 (+482)
3DMark Fire Strike 14,818 16,331 (+1513)
Geekbench OpenCL 60,911 71,412 (+10501)
Geekbench Vulkan 58,130 65,858 (+7728)
Normalized score 63.7 66.4 (+2.7)

Only in component B

DLSS ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce RTX 2060 Delta
Anno 1800 69 FPS 61 FPS +13.1% (A)
Anthem 73 FPS 56 FPS +30.4% (A)
Apex Legends 102 FPS 105 FPS 2.9% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 69 FPS 68 FPS +1.5% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 49 FPS 53 FPS 8.2% (B)
Battlefield 5 111 FPS 104 FPS +6.7% (A)
Borderlands 3 62 FPS 61 FPS +1.6% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 112 FPS 106 FPS +5.7% (A)
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 68 FPS 62 FPS +9.7% (A)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 88 FPS 74 FPS +18.9% (A)
Control 51 FPS 54 FPS 5.9% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 147 FPS 150 FPS 2% (B)
Crysis Remastered 55 FPS 53 FPS +3.8% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 86 FPS 60 FPS +43.3% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 47 FPS 45 FPS +4.4% (A)
Darksiders III 75 FPS 103 FPS 37.3% (B)
Days Gone 83 FPS 87 FPS 4.8% (B)
Death Stranding 88 FPS 92 FPS 4.5% (B)
Deus Ex Mankind Divided 79 FPS 86 FPS 8.9% (B)
Dirt 5 56 FPS 59 FPS 5.4% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 107 FPS 113 FPS 5.6% (B)
Dishonored 2 100 FPS 110 FPS 10% (B)
Doom 144 FPS 125 FPS +15.2% (A)
Doom Eternal 133 FPS 112 FPS +18.8% (A)
Dota 2 121 FPS 118 FPS +2.5% (A)
ELEX 90 FPS 96 FPS 6.7% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 117 FPS 121 FPS 3.4% (B)
F1 2018 126 FPS 103 FPS +22.3% (A)
F1 2019 121 FPS 122 FPS 0.8% (B)
F1 2020 122 FPS 126 FPS 3.3% (B)
F1 2021 120 FPS 126 FPS 5% (B)
FIFA 19 256 FPS 280 FPS 9.4% (B)
FIFA 20 181 FPS 111 FPS +63.1% (A)
FIFA 21 214 FPS 163 FPS +31.3% (A)
Far Cry 5 93 FPS 96 FPS 3.2% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 79 FPS 77 FPS +2.6% (A)
Farming Simulator 19 145 FPS 151 FPS 4.1% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 55 FPS 52 FPS +5.8% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 39 FPS 42 FPS 7.7% (B)
For Honor 120 FPS 132 FPS 10% (B)
Fortnite 120 FPS 162 FPS 35% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 134 FPS 108 FPS +24.1% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 107 FPS 100 FPS +7% (A)
GRID 2019 91 FPS 65 FPS +40% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 124 FPS 95 FPS +30.5% (A)
Gears Tactics 90 FPS 93 FPS 3.3% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 70 FPS 74 FPS 5.7% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 79 FPS 86 FPS 8.9% (B)
Hitman 2 82 FPS 81 FPS +1.2% (A)
Hitman 3 99 FPS 105 FPS 6.1% (B)
Horizon Zero Dawn 70 FPS 67 FPS +4.5% (A)
Hunt Showdown 69 FPS 75 FPS 8.7% (B)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 59 FPS 54 FPS +9.3% (A)
Just Cause 4 73 FPS 82 FPS 12.3% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 77 FPS 83 FPS 7.8% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 67 FPS 60 FPS +11.7% (A)
Metro Exodus 54 FPS 56 FPS 3.7% (B)
Middle-earth: Shadow of War 89 FPS 103 FPS 15.7% (B)
Mirror's Edge Catalyst 101 FPS 110 FPS 8.9% (B)
Monster Hunter World 82 FPS 90 FPS 9.8% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 80 FPS 63 FPS +27% (A)
Need for Speed Payback 113 FPS 122 FPS 8% (B)
Outriders 84 FPS 90 FPS 7.1% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Prey 143 FPS 139 FPS +2.9% (A)
Rage 2 70 FPS 73 FPS 4.3% (B)
Rainbow Six Siege 201 FPS 206 FPS 2.5% (B)
Red Dead Redemption 2 51 FPS 51 FPS ≈
Resident Evil 4 Remake 75 FPS 65 FPS +15.4% (A)
Resident Evil 7 147 FPS 160 FPS 8.8% (B)
Resident Evil Village 99 FPS 95 FPS +4.2% (A)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 86 FPS 107 FPS 24.4% (B)
Rocket League 209 FPS 181 FPS +15.5% (A)
Serious Sam 4 67 FPS 58 FPS +15.5% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114 FPS 122 FPS 7% (B)
Star Wars Battlefront 2 95 FPS 121 FPS 27.4% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 85 FPS 66 FPS +28.8% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 159 FPS 173 FPS 8.8% (B)
The Crew 2 60 FPS 60 FPS ≈
The Division 2 78 FPS 74 FPS +5.4% (A)
The Witcher 3 103 FPS 111 FPS 7.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 93 FPS 74 FPS +25.7% (A)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 64 FPS 67 FPS 4.7% (B)
Valorant 209 FPS 223 FPS 6.7% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 71 FPS 66 FPS +7.6% (A)
World of Warships 148 FPS 129 FPS +14.7% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 64 FPS 56 FPS +14.3% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 74 FPS 72 FPS +2.8% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 2060 wins 14 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews