Component comparison
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+176 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+35 W)
- + TMUs (+32)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+45.12 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+90.22 GTexel/s)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+2438)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+5853)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+16632)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+15100)
- + Normalized score (+8.5)
B
GeForce RTX 2050
- + Release year (+2)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+2,100M)
- + Die size (mm²) (+84 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+512)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+0.63 TFLOPS)
- + Energy efficiency (+4.8)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2050
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2019 | 2021 (+2) |
| VRAM (GB) | 6 GB (+2 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | 1750 MHz (+250 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 288 GB/s (+176 GB/s) | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit (+128 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 80 W (+35 W) | 45 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm | 8 nm (-4 nm) |
| Transistors (M) | 6,600M | 8,700M (+2,100M) |
| Die size (mm²) | 284 mm² | 200 mm² (+84 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 735 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1245 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1,536 | 2,048 (+512) |
| TMUs | 96 (+32) | 64 |
| ROPs | 48 (+16) | 32 |
| RT cores | — | 32 |
| Tensor cores | — | 64 |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 4.10 TFLOPS | 4.73 TFLOPS (+0.63 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 84.96 GPixel/s (+45.12 GPixel/s) | 39.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 169.90 GTexel/s (+90.22 GTexel/s) | 79.68 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 24.9 | 29.6 (+4.8) |
| PassMark (overall) | 12,618 | — |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 5,659 (+2438) | 3,221 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 14,818 (+5853) | 8,965 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 60,911 (+16632) | 44,279 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 58,130 (+15100) | 43,030 |
| Normalized score | 63.7 (+8.5) | 55.2 |
Only in component B
DLSS
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2050 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 45 FPS | 21 FPS | +114.3% (A) |
| Alan Wake 2 | 30 FPS | 14 FPS | +114.3% (A) |
| Alan Wake Remastered | 83 FPS | 50 FPS | +66% (A) |
| Armored Core 6 | 64 FPS | 32 FPS | +100% (A) |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage | 66 FPS | 25 FPS | +164% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 49 FPS | 21 FPS | +133.3% (A) |
| Atlas Fallen | 74 FPS | 43 FPS | +72.1% (A) |
| Atomic Heart | 50 FPS | 30 FPS | +66.7% (A) |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora | 28 FPS | 12 FPS | +133.3% (A) |
| Back 4 Blood | 126 FPS | 66 FPS | +90.9% (A) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 54 FPS | 30 FPS | +80% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 111 FPS | ≈ 70 FPS | +58.6% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | ≈ 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Company of Heroes 3 | 52 FPS | 27 FPS | +92.6% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 147 FPS | ≈ 74 FPS | +98.6% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 104 FPS | 46 FPS | +126.1% (A) |
| Crysis Remastered | 55 FPS | 25 FPS | +120% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 86 FPS | 18 FPS | +377.8% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 54 FPS | 19 FPS | +184.2% (A) |
| Days Gone | 83 FPS | 45 FPS | +84.4% (A) |
| Dead Island 2 | 86 FPS | 31 FPS | +177.4% (A) |
| Dead Space Remake | 40 FPS | 20 FPS | +100% (A) |
| Death Stranding | 88 FPS | 50 FPS | +76% (A) |
| Deathloop | 66 FPS | 30 FPS | +120% (A) |
| Diablo 4 | 113 FPS | 39 FPS | +189.7% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 121 FPS | 71 FPS | +70.4% (A) |
| Dying Light 2 | 40 FPS | 24 FPS | +66.7% (A) |
| EA Sports WRC | 52 FPS | 20 FPS | +160% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 57 FPS | 39 FPS | +46.2% (A) |
| Elex 2 | 53 FPS | 32 FPS | +65.6% (A) |
| Enshrouded | 34 FPS | 24 FPS | +41.7% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 117 FPS | 70 FPS | +67.1% (A) |
| F1 2021 | 120 FPS | 66 FPS | +81.8% (A) |
| F1 22 | 117 FPS | 55 FPS | +112.7% (A) |
| F1 23 | 109 FPS | 37 FPS | +194.6% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 93 FPS | 35 FPS | +165.7% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 78 FPS | 43 FPS | +81.4% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 121 FPS | 63 FPS | +92.1% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 55 FPS | 25 FPS | +120% (A) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 39 FPS | 19 FPS | +105.3% (A) |
| Fortnite | 120 FPS | ≈ 95 FPS | +26.3% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 134 FPS | ≈ 70 FPS | +91.4% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 107 FPS | 53 FPS | +101.9% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 118 FPS | 61 FPS | +93.4% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | ≈ 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 124 FPS | 74 FPS | +67.6% (A) |
| Gears Tactics | 90 FPS | 55 FPS | +63.6% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 89 FPS | 51 FPS | +74.5% (A) |
| God of War | 52 FPS | 29 FPS | +79.3% (A) |
| Guardians of the Galaxy | 72 FPS | 47 FPS | +53.2% (A) |
| Halo Infinite | 70 FPS | 41 FPS | +70.7% (A) |
| High On Life | 78 FPS | 35 FPS | +122.9% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 99 FPS | 59 FPS | +67.8% (A) |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 48 FPS | 26 FPS | +84.6% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 69 FPS | 54 FPS | +27.8% (A) |
| Immortals of Aveum | 44 FPS | 17 FPS | +158.8% (A) |
| Lies of P | 77 FPS | 29 FPS | +165.5% (A) |
| Lords of the Fallen | 30 FPS | 11 FPS | +172.7% (A) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 67 FPS | 39 FPS | +71.8% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 54 FPS | ≈ 35 FPS | +54.3% (A) |
| Monster Hunter Stories 2 | 134 FPS | 90 FPS | +48.9% (A) |
| Need for Speed Unbound | 67 FPS | 28 FPS | +139.3% (A) |
| Outriders | 84 FPS | 34 FPS | +147.1% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | ≈ 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | ≈ 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Palworld | 55 FPS | 38 FPS | +44.7% (A) |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown | 291 FPS | 195 FPS | +49.2% (A) |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 105 FPS | 66 FPS | +59.1% (A) |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart | 40 FPS | 18 FPS | +122.2% (A) |
| Ready or Not | 101 FPS | 75 FPS | +34.7% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 75 FPS | 17 FPS | +341.2% (A) |
| Resident Evil Village | 99 FPS | 58 FPS | +70.7% (A) |
| Returnal | 52 FPS | 21 FPS | +147.6% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 55 FPS | 38 FPS | +44.7% (A) |
| Serious Sam 4 | 67 FPS | 32 FPS | +109.4% (A) |
| Skull & Bones | 55 FPS | 33 FPS | +66.7% (A) |
| Sons of the Forest | 55 FPS | 34 FPS | +61.8% (A) |
| Spider-Man Miles Morales | 76 FPS | 32 FPS | +137.5% (A) |
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor | 39 FPS | 20 FPS | +95% (A) |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 159 FPS | 111 FPS | +43.2% (A) |
| Starfield | 30 FPS | 16 FPS | +87.5% (A) |
| The Crew Motorfest | 52 FPS | 24 FPS | +116.7% (A) |
| The Finals | 99 FPS | 68 FPS | +45.6% (A) |
| The Last of Us | 42 FPS | 18 FPS | +133.3% (A) |
| The Quarry | 56 FPS | 31 FPS | +80.6% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 103 FPS | ≈ 58 FPS | +77.6% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 93 FPS | 47 FPS | +97.9% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 43 FPS | 19 FPS | +126.3% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 67 FPS | 38 FPS | +76.3% (A) |
| Total War Pharaoh | 82 FPS | 30 FPS | +173.3% (A) |
| Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection | 51 FPS | 13 FPS | +292.3% (A) |
| Valorant | 209 FPS | ≈ 130 FPS | +60.8% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 124 FPS | 73 FPS | +69.9% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 71 FPS | 39 FPS | +82.1% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 64 FPS | 59 FPS | +8.5% (A) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 74 FPS | 43 FPS | +72.1% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings. Values for GeForce RTX 2050 are model predictions (≈); GeForce GTX 1660 Ti are direct measurements.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti wins 13 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).