Component comparison
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce 940M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce 940M — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- + Release year (+4)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+600 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+274 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+5 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-16 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+4,730M)
- + CUDA cores (+1152)
- + TMUs (+72)
- + ROPs (+40)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+3.20 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+67.39 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+134.76 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+18.5)
- + PassMark (overall) (+11485)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+13196)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+54886)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+53581)
- + Normalized score (+57.5)
B
GeForce 940M
- + Die size (mm²) (+136 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
|
Component B
GeForce 940M
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2019 (+4) | 2015 |
| VRAM (GB) | 6 GB (+4 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz (+600 MHz) | 900 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 288 GB/s (+274 GB/s) | 14 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit (+128 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 80 W (+5 W) | 75 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm (-16 nm) | 28 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 6,600M (+4,730M) | 1,870M |
| Die size (mm²) | 284 mm² | 148 mm² (+136 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1098 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1,536 (+1152) | 384 |
| TMUs | 96 (+72) | 24 |
| ROPs | 48 (+40) | 8 |
| RT cores | — | — |
| Tensor cores | — | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 4.10 TFLOPS (+3.20 TFLOPS) | 0.90 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 84.96 GPixel/s (+67.39 GPixel/s) | 17.57 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 169.90 GTexel/s (+134.76 GTexel/s) | 35.14 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 24.9 (+18.5) | 6.4 |
| PassMark (overall) | 12,618 (+11485) | 1,133 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 5,659 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 14,818 (+13196) | 1,622 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 60,911 (+54886) | 6,025 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 58,130 (+53581) | 4,549 |
| Normalized score | 63.7 (+57.5) | 6.2 |
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce 940M | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anno 1800 | 69 FPS | 7 FPS | +885.7% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 111 FPS | 17 FPS | +552.9% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 147 FPS | 9 FPS | +1533.3% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 86 FPS | 5 FPS | +1620% (A) |
| Darksiders III | 75 FPS | 13 FPS | +476.9% (A) |
| Doom | 144 FPS | 17 FPS | +747.1% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 121 FPS | 49 FPS | +146.9% (A) |
| ELEX | 90 FPS | 11 FPS | +718.2% (A) |
| F1 2018 | 126 FPS | 17 FPS | +641.2% (A) |
| F1 2019 | 121 FPS | 18 FPS | +572.2% (A) |
| FIFA 19 | 256 FPS | 34 FPS | +652.9% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 93 FPS | 11 FPS | +745.5% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 19 | 145 FPS | 19 FPS | +663.2% (A) |
| For Honor | 120 FPS | 14 FPS | +757.1% (A) |
| Fortnite | 120 FPS | 36 FPS | +233.3% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 134 FPS | 14 FPS | +857.1% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 107 FPS | 6 FPS | +1683.3% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 124 FPS | 14 FPS | +785.7% (A) |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands | 79 FPS | 10 FPS | +690% (A) |
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance | 77 FPS | 10 FPS | +670% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 54 FPS | 2 FPS | +2600% (A) |
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst | 101 FPS | 12 FPS | +741.7% (A) |
| Need for Speed Payback | 113 FPS | 13 FPS | +769.2% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Siege | 201 FPS | 20 FPS | +905% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 75 FPS | 3 FPS | +2400% (A) |
| Resident Evil 7 | 147 FPS | 15 FPS | +880% (A) |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | 86 FPS | 10 FPS | +760% (A) |
| Rocket League | 209 FPS | 24 FPS | +770.8% (A) |
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 | 95 FPS | 13 FPS | +630.8% (A) |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | 85 FPS | 11 FPS | +672.7% (A) |
| The Crew 2 | 60 FPS | 11 FPS | +445.5% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 103 FPS | 10 FPS | +930% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 93 FPS | 10 FPS | +830% (A) |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 64 FPS | 9 FPS | +611.1% (A) |
| Valorant | 209 FPS | 40 FPS | +422.5% (A) |
| World of Warships | 148 FPS | 37 FPS | +300% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti wins 20 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).