Component comparison
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX A1000
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX A1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce GTX 1650
Components are close in specs
B
RTX A1000
- + Release year (+4)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+96 GB/s)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+1280)
- + TMUs (+8)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+4.43 TFLOPS)
- + Energy efficiency (+13.5)
- + PassMark (overall) (+3637)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+14491)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+14196)
- + Normalized score (+3.9)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce GTX 1650
|
Component B
RTX A1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2020 | 2024 (+4) |
| VRAM (GB) | 4 GB | 8 GB (+4 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 128 GB/s | 224 GB/s (+96 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 50 W | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm | 8 nm (-4 nm) |
| Transistors (M) | 4,700M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 1,024 | 2,304 (+1280) |
| TMUs | 64 | 72 (+8) |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| RT cores | — | 18 |
| Tensor cores | — | 72 |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 2.30 TFLOPS | 6.74 TFLOPS (+4.43 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 53.28 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 93.24 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 26.4 | 39.9 (+13.5) |
| PassMark (overall) | 7,116 | 10,753 (+3637) |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,488 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 9,313 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 39,153 | 53,644 (+14491) |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 36,248 | 50,444 (+14196) |
| Normalized score | 53.3 | 57.2 (+3.9) |
Only in component B
DLSS
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
RTX A1000 wins 12 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).