Component comparison
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 5050
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 5050 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce GTX 1650
- + Energy efficiency (+2.1)
- + Normalized score (+12.0)
B
GeForce RTX 5050
- + Release year (+5)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+192 GB/s)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+65 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-9 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+12,200M)
- + Die size (mm²) (+51 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+1536)
- + TMUs (+16)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+10.87 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+29.02 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+112.56 GTexel/s)
- + PassMark (overall) (+6951)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce GTX 1650
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 5050
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2020 | 2025 (+5) |
| VRAM (GB) | 4 GB | 8 GB (+4 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 128 GB/s | 320 GB/s (+192 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 50 W | 115 W (+65 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm | 3 nm (-9 nm) |
| Transistors (M) | 4,700M | 16,900M (+12,200M) |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² | 149 mm² (+51 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 1,024 | 2,560 (+1536) |
| TMUs | 64 | 80 (+16) |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| RT cores | — | 20 |
| Tensor cores | — | 80 |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 2.30 TFLOPS | 13.17 TFLOPS (+10.87 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 53.28 GPixel/s | 82.30 GPixel/s (+29.02 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 93.24 GTexel/s | 205.80 GTexel/s (+112.56 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 26.4 (+2.1) | 24.3 |
| PassMark (overall) | 7,116 | 14,067 (+6951) |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,488 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 9,313 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 39,153 | — |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 36,248 | — |
| Normalized score | 53.3 (+12.0) | 41.3 |
Only in component B
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5050 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5050 wins 13 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).