Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4080

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4080 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1650
  • + Die size (mm²) (+179 mm²)
B GeForce RTX 4080
  • + Release year (+3)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+8 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+750 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+588 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+60 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-8 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+41,200M)
  • + CUDA cores (+8704)
  • + TMUs (+240)
  • + ROPs (+80)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+46.44 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+227.32 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+668.26 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+15.4)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+17637)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+15046)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+32118)
  • + Normalized score (+19.5)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1650
 Component B
GeForce RTX 4080
Release year 2020 2023 (+3)
VRAM (GB) 4 GB 12 GB (+8 GB)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz 2250 MHz (+750 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 128 GB/s 716 GB/s (+588 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 256 bit (+128 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 50 W 110 W (+60 W)
Lithography (nm) 12 nm 4 nm (-8 nm)
Transistors (M) 4,700M 45,900M (+41,200M)
Die size (mm²) 200 mm² (+179 mm²) 379 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 1,024 9,728 (+8704)
TMUs 64 304 (+240)
ROPs 32 112 (+80)
RT cores — 76
Tensor cores — 304
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 2.30 TFLOPS 48.74 TFLOPS (+46.44 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 53.28 GPixel/s 280.60 GPixel/s (+227.32 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 93.24 GTexel/s 761.50 GTexel/s (+668.26 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 26.4 41.8 (+15.4)
PassMark (overall) 7,116 24,753 (+17637)
3DMark Time Spy 3,488 18,534 (+15046)
3DMark Fire Strike 9,313 41,431 (+32118)
Geekbench OpenCL 39,153 —
Geekbench Vulkan 36,248 —
Normalized score 53.3 72.8 (+19.5)

Only in component B

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce RTX 4080 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 26 FPS 98 FPS 276.9% (B)
Alan Wake 2 19 FPS 77 FPS 305.3% (B)
Armored Core 6 42 FPS 112 FPS 166.7% (B)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 28 FPS 176 FPS 528.6% (B)
Atlas Fallen 47 FPS 115 FPS 144.7% (B)
Atomic Heart 30 FPS 121 FPS 303.3% (B)
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora 13 FPS 111 FPS 753.8% (B)
Back 4 Blood 82 FPS 295 FPS 259.8% (B)
Baldur's Gate 3 33 FPS 122 FPS 269.7% (B)
Battlefield 5 60 FPS 160 FPS 166.7% (B)
Borderlands 3 36 FPS 158 FPS 338.9% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 37 FPS 164 FPS 343.2% (B)
Company of Heroes 3 45 FPS 207 FPS 360% (B)
Control 32 FPS 157 FPS 390.6% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 131 FPS 290 FPS 121.4% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 80 FPS 207 FPS 158.8% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 52 FPS 149 FPS 186.5% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 32 FPS 105 FPS 228.1% (B)
Days Gone 56 FPS 215 FPS 283.9% (B)
Dead Island 2 50 FPS 206 FPS 312% (B)
Dead Space Remake 22 FPS 113 FPS 413.6% (B)
Deathloop 37 FPS 129 FPS 248.6% (B)
Diablo 4 72 FPS 322 FPS 347.2% (B)
Dota 2 96 FPS 178 FPS 85.4% (B)
Dying Light 2 24 FPS 141 FPS 487.5% (B)
EA Sports WRC 26 FPS 107 FPS 311.5% (B)
Elden Ring 51 FPS 60 FPS 17.6% (B)
Elex 2 37 FPS 119 FPS 221.6% (B)
Enshrouded 15 FPS 78 FPS 420% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 80 FPS 120 FPS 50% (B)
F1 22 74 FPS 186 FPS 151.4% (B)
F1 23 66 FPS 227 FPS 243.9% (B)
Far Cry 5 60 FPS 171 FPS 185% (B)
Far Cry 6 47 FPS 134 FPS 185.1% (B)
Farming Simulator 22 77 FPS 217 FPS 181.8% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 32 FPS 129 FPS 303.1% (B)
Fortnite 90 FPS 270 FPS 200% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 82 FPS 230 FPS 180.5% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 73 FPS 249 FPS 241.1% (B)
GRID Legends 76 FPS 199 FPS 161.8% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 68 FPS 165 FPS 142.6% (B)
Ghostwire Tokyo 53 FPS 154 FPS 190.6% (B)
God of War 30 FPS 138 FPS 360% (B)
Guardians of the Galaxy 46 FPS 165 FPS 258.7% (B)
Halo Infinite 41 FPS 209 FPS 409.8% (B)
High On Life 49 FPS 163 FPS 232.7% (B)
Hogwarts Legacy 29 FPS 134 FPS 362.1% (B)
Immortals of Aveum 26 FPS 84 FPS 223.1% (B)
Lies of P 47 FPS 226 FPS 380.9% (B)
Lords of the Fallen 18 FPS 91 FPS 405.6% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 43 FPS 171 FPS 297.7% (B)
Metro Exodus 33 FPS 146 FPS 342.4% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 33 FPS 95 FPS 187.9% (B)
Outriders 54 FPS 151 FPS 179.6% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Palworld 34 FPS 134 FPS 294.1% (B)
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown 211 FPS 356 FPS 68.7% (B)
Rainbow Six Extraction 69 FPS 272 FPS 294.2% (B)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 15 FPS 124 FPS 726.7% (B)
Ready or Not 64 FPS 122 FPS 90.6% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 46 FPS 170 FPS 269.6% (B)
Resident Evil Village 64 FPS 239 FPS 273.4% (B)
Returnal 33 FPS 114 FPS 245.5% (B)
Riders Republic 46 FPS 169 FPS 267.4% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 59 FPS 263 FPS 345.8% (B)
Sons of the Forest 32 FPS 75 FPS 134.4% (B)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 34 FPS 103 FPS 202.9% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 22 FPS 106 FPS 381.8% (B)
Starfield 18 FPS 75 FPS 316.7% (B)
The Callisto Protocol 53 FPS 120 FPS 126.4% (B)
The Crew Motorfest 33 FPS 60 FPS 81.8% (B)
The Finals 60 FPS 171 FPS 185% (B)
The Last of Us 19 FPS 118 FPS 521.1% (B)
The Quarry 34 FPS 174 FPS 411.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 62 FPS 334 FPS 438.7% (B)
The Witcher 3 45 FPS 246 FPS 446.7% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 20 FPS 144 FPS 620% (B)
Total War Pharaoh 53 FPS 192 FPS 262.3% (B)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 17 FPS 100 FPS 488.2% (B)
Valorant 164 FPS 300 FPS 82.9% (B)
Vampire Bloodhunt 77 FPS 239 FPS 210.4% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 39 FPS 121 FPS 210.3% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 45 FPS 89 FPS 97.8% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 4080 wins 19 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews