Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1650
  • + Die size (mm²) (+192 mm²)
B GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • + Release year (+2)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+480 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+65 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+12,700M)
  • + CUDA cores (+5120)
  • + TMUs (+128)
  • + ROPs (+64)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+19.45 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+116.62 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+246.56 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+1.5)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+10187)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+6974)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+18463)
  • + Normalized score (+10.3)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1650
Component B
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Release year 2020 2022 (+2)
VRAM (GB) 4 GB 8 GB (+4 GB)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz 1750 MHz (+250 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 128 GB/s 608 GB/s (+480 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 256 bit (+128 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 50 W 115 W (+65 W)
Lithography (nm) 12 nm 8 nm (-4 nm)
Transistors (M) 4,700M 17,400M (+12,700M)
Die size (mm²) 200 mm² (+192 mm²) 392 mm²
Base clock (MHz)
Boost clock (MHz)
CUDA cores 1,024 6,144 (+5120)
TMUs 64 192 (+128)
ROPs 32 96 (+64)
RT cores 48
Tensor cores 192
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 2.30 TFLOPS 21.75 TFLOPS (+19.45 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 53.28 GPixel/s 169.90 GPixel/s (+116.62 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 93.24 GTexel/s 339.80 GTexel/s (+246.56 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 26.4 27.9 (+1.5)
PassMark (overall) 7,116 17,303 (+10187)
3DMark Time Spy 3,488 10,462 (+6974)
3DMark Fire Strike 9,313 27,776 (+18463)
Geekbench OpenCL 39,153
Geekbench Vulkan 36,248
Normalized score 53.3 63.6 (+10.3)

Only in component B

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 26 FPS 71 FPS 173.1% (B)
Alan Wake Remastered 63 FPS 131 FPS 107.9% (B)
Armored Core 6 42 FPS 90 FPS 114.3% (B)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 28 FPS 102 FPS 264.3% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 21 FPS 85 FPS 304.8% (B)
Atlas Fallen 47 FPS 119 FPS 153.2% (B)
Atomic Heart 30 FPS 95 FPS 216.7% (B)
Back 4 Blood 82 FPS 189 FPS 130.5% (B)
Baldur's Gate 3 33 FPS 95 FPS 187.9% (B)
Battlefield 2042 44 FPS 97 FPS 120.5% (B)
Battlefield 5 60 FPS 130 FPS 116.7% (B)
Borderlands 3 36 FPS 92 FPS 155.6% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS
Company of Heroes 3 45 FPS 148 FPS 228.9% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 131 FPS 220 FPS 67.9% (B)
Crysis Remastered 31 FPS 72 FPS 132.3% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 52 FPS 129 FPS 148.1% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 21 FPS 67 FPS 219% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 32 FPS 65 FPS 103.1% (B)
Days Gone 56 FPS 115 FPS 105.4% (B)
Dead Island 2 50 FPS 173 FPS 246% (B)
Dead Space Remake 22 FPS 68 FPS 209.1% (B)
Death Stranding 57 FPS 132 FPS 131.6% (B)
Deathloop 37 FPS 98 FPS 164.9% (B)
Diablo 4 72 FPS 223 FPS 209.7% (B)
Dirt 5 35 FPS 98 FPS 180% (B)
Doom Eternal 63 FPS 196 FPS 211.1% (B)
Dota 2 96 FPS 146 FPS 52.1% (B)
Dying Light 2 24 FPS 66 FPS 175% (B)
Elden Ring 51 FPS 60 FPS 17.6% (B)
Elex 2 37 FPS 83 FPS 124.3% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 80 FPS 120 FPS 50% (B)
F1 2021 77 FPS 139 FPS 80.5% (B)
F1 22 74 FPS 157 FPS 112.2% (B)
F1 23 66 FPS 178 FPS 169.7% (B)
Far Cry 5 60 FPS 138 FPS 130% (B)
Far Cry 6 47 FPS 89 FPS 89.4% (B)
Farming Simulator 22 77 FPS 149 FPS 93.5% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 32 FPS 50 FPS 56.3% (B)
Flight Simulator 2020 26 FPS 70 FPS 169.2% (B)
Fortnite 90 FPS 180 FPS 100% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 82 FPS 160 FPS 95.1% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 73 FPS 210 FPS 187.7% (B)
GRID Legends 76 FPS 148 FPS 94.7% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS
GTA V 68 FPS 80 FPS 17.6% (B)
Gears Tactics 61 FPS 135 FPS 121.3% (B)
Ghostwire Tokyo 53 FPS 124 FPS 134% (B)
God of War 30 FPS 77 FPS 156.7% (B)
Guardians of the Galaxy 46 FPS 111 FPS 141.3% (B)
Halo Infinite 41 FPS 101 FPS 146.3% (B)
High On Life 49 FPS 118 FPS 140.8% (B)
Hitman 3 55 FPS 146 FPS 165.5% (B)
Hogwarts Legacy 29 FPS 70 FPS 141.4% (B)
Hunt Showdown 46 FPS 116 FPS 152.2% (B)
Immortals of Aveum 26 FPS 53 FPS 103.8% (B)
Lies of P 47 FPS 134 FPS 185.1% (B)
Lords of the Fallen 18 FPS 56 FPS 211.1% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 43 FPS 95 FPS 120.9% (B)
Metro Exodus 33 FPS 95 FPS 187.9% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 33 FPS 93 FPS 181.8% (B)
New World 42 FPS 93 FPS 121.4% (B)
Outriders 54 FPS 124 FPS 129.6% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS
Rainbow Six Extraction 69 FPS 176 FPS 155.1% (B)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 15 FPS 60 FPS 300% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 46 FPS 110 FPS 139.1% (B)
Resident Evil Village 64 FPS 160 FPS 150% (B)
Returnal 33 FPS 103 FPS 212.1% (B)
Riders Republic 46 FPS 104 FPS 126.1% (B)
Serious Sam 4 41 FPS 99 FPS 141.5% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 59 FPS 124 FPS 110.2% (B)
Sons of the Forest 32 FPS 83 FPS 159.4% (B)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 34 FPS 93 FPS 173.5% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 22 FPS 74 FPS 236.4% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 89 FPS 269 FPS 202.2% (B)
Starfield 18 FPS 50 FPS 177.8% (B)
The Callisto Protocol 53 FPS 71 FPS 34% (B)
The Crew Motorfest 33 FPS 60 FPS 81.8% (B)
The Quarry 34 FPS 98 FPS 188.2% (B)
The Witcher 3 62 FPS 188 FPS 203.2% (B)
The Witcher 3 45 FPS 140 FPS 211.1% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 20 FPS 81 FPS 305% (B)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 17 FPS 72 FPS 323.5% (B)
Valorant 164 FPS 230 FPS 40.2% (B)
Vampire Bloodhunt 77 FPS 173 FPS 124.7% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 39 FPS 96 FPS 146.2% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 45 FPS 52 FPS 15.6% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 38 FPS 113 FPS 197.4% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 19 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).