Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1650
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+245 mm²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+8.3)
B GeForce RTX 2060
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+208 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+65 W)
  • + Transistors (M) (+6,100M)
  • + CUDA cores (+896)
  • + TMUs (+56)
  • + ROPs (+16)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+4.15 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+27.36 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+108.36 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+6978)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+2653)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+7018)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+32259)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+29610)
  • + Normalized score (+13.1)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1650
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
Release year 2020 (+1) 2019
VRAM (GB) 4 GB 6 GB (+2 GB)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz 1750 MHz (+250 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 128 GB/s 336 GB/s (+208 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 192 bit (+64 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 50 W 115 W (+65 W)
Lithography (nm) 12 nm 12 nm
Transistors (M) 4,700M 10,800M (+6,100M)
Die size (mm²) 200 mm² (+245 mm²) 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 1,024 1,920 (+896)
TMUs 64 120 (+56)
ROPs 32 48 (+16)
RT cores — 30
Tensor cores — 240
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 2.30 TFLOPS 6.45 TFLOPS (+4.15 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 53.28 GPixel/s 80.64 GPixel/s (+27.36 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 93.24 GTexel/s 201.60 GTexel/s (+108.36 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 26.4 (+8.3) 18.1
PassMark (overall) 7,116 14,094 (+6978)
3DMark Time Spy 3,488 6,141 (+2653)
3DMark Fire Strike 9,313 16,331 (+7018)
Geekbench OpenCL 39,153 71,412 (+32259)
Geekbench Vulkan 36,248 65,858 (+29610)
Normalized score 53.3 66.4 (+13.1)

Only in component B

DLSS ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce RTX 2060 Delta
Anno 1800 34 FPS 61 FPS 79.4% (B)
Anthem 34 FPS 56 FPS 64.7% (B)
Apex Legends 67 FPS 105 FPS 56.7% (B)
Ashes of the Singularity 36 FPS 64 FPS 77.8% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 35 FPS 68 FPS 94.3% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 21 FPS 53 FPS 152.4% (B)
Battlefield 5 60 FPS 104 FPS 73.3% (B)
Borderlands 3 36 FPS 61 FPS 69.4% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 72 FPS 106 FPS 47.2% (B)
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 25 FPS 62 FPS 148% (B)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 51 FPS 74 FPS 45.1% (B)
Civilization 6 59 FPS 92 FPS 55.9% (B)
Control 32 FPS 54 FPS 68.8% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 131 FPS 150 FPS 14.5% (B)
Crysis Remastered 31 FPS 53 FPS 71% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 52 FPS 60 FPS 15.4% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 21 FPS 45 FPS 114.3% (B)
Darksiders III 57 FPS 103 FPS 80.7% (B)
Days Gone 56 FPS 87 FPS 55.4% (B)
Death Stranding 57 FPS 92 FPS 61.4% (B)
Destiny 2 73 FPS 111 FPS 52.1% (B)
Deus Ex Mankind Divided 53 FPS 86 FPS 62.3% (B)
Dirt 5 35 FPS 59 FPS 68.6% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 69 FPS 113 FPS 63.8% (B)
Dishonored 2 68 FPS 110 FPS 61.8% (B)
Doom 109 FPS 125 FPS 14.7% (B)
Doom Eternal 63 FPS 112 FPS 77.8% (B)
Dota 2 96 FPS 118 FPS 22.9% (B)
ELEX 59 FPS 96 FPS 62.7% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 80 FPS 121 FPS 51.3% (B)
F1 2018 91 FPS 103 FPS 13.2% (B)
F1 2019 70 FPS 122 FPS 74.3% (B)
F1 2020 69 FPS 126 FPS 82.6% (B)
F1 2021 77 FPS 126 FPS 63.6% (B)
FIFA 19 94 FPS 280 FPS 197.9% (B)
FIFA 20 148 FPS 111 FPS +33.3% (A)
FIFA 21 120 FPS 163 FPS 35.8% (B)
Far Cry 5 60 FPS 96 FPS 60% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 44 FPS 77 FPS 75% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 98 FPS 151 FPS 54.1% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 32 FPS 52 FPS 62.5% (B)
Flight Simulator 2020 26 FPS 42 FPS 61.5% (B)
For Honor 77 FPS 132 FPS 71.4% (B)
Fortnite 90 FPS 162 FPS 80% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 82 FPS 108 FPS 31.7% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 73 FPS 100 FPS 37% (B)
GRID 2019 52 FPS 65 FPS 25% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 68 FPS 95 FPS 39.7% (B)
Gears Tactics 61 FPS 93 FPS 52.5% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 44 FPS 74 FPS 68.2% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 57 FPS 86 FPS 50.9% (B)
Hitman 2 60 FPS 81 FPS 35% (B)
Hitman 3 55 FPS 105 FPS 90.9% (B)
Horizon Zero Dawn 41 FPS 67 FPS 63.4% (B)
Hunt Showdown 46 FPS 75 FPS 63% (B)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 25 FPS 54 FPS 116% (B)
Just Cause 4 56 FPS 82 FPS 46.4% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 53 FPS 83 FPS 56.6% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 43 FPS 60 FPS 39.5% (B)
Metro Exodus 33 FPS 56 FPS 69.7% (B)
Middle-earth: Shadow of War 57 FPS 103 FPS 80.7% (B)
Mirror's Edge Catalyst 69 FPS 110 FPS 59.4% (B)
Monster Hunter World 51 FPS 90 FPS 76.5% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 51 FPS 63 FPS 23.5% (B)
Need for Speed Payback 78 FPS 122 FPS 56.4% (B)
Outriders 54 FPS 90 FPS 66.7% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Prey 103 FPS 139 FPS 35% (B)
Rage 2 46 FPS 73 FPS 58.7% (B)
Rainbow Six Siege 154 FPS 206 FPS 33.8% (B)
Red Dead Redemption 2 32 FPS 51 FPS 59.4% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 46 FPS 65 FPS 41.3% (B)
Resident Evil 7 95 FPS 160 FPS 68.4% (B)
Resident Evil Village 64 FPS 95 FPS 48.4% (B)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 58 FPS 107 FPS 84.5% (B)
Rocket League 96 FPS 181 FPS 88.5% (B)
Serious Sam 4 41 FPS 58 FPS 41.5% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 59 FPS 122 FPS 106.8% (B)
Star Wars Battlefront 2 66 FPS 121 FPS 83.3% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 60 FPS 66 FPS 10% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 89 FPS 173 FPS 94.4% (B)
The Crew 2 60 FPS 60 FPS ≈
The Division 2 46 FPS 74 FPS 60.9% (B)
The Witcher 3 62 FPS 111 FPS 79% (B)
The Witcher 3 45 FPS 74 FPS 64.4% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 39 FPS 67 FPS 71.8% (B)
Valorant 164 FPS 223 FPS 36% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 39 FPS 66 FPS 69.2% (B)
World of Warships 85 FPS 129 FPS 51.8% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 45 FPS 56 FPS 24.4% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 38 FPS 72 FPS 89.5% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 2060 wins 18 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews