Component comparison
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce GTX 1650
- + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+72 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+30 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+1,400M)
- + CUDA cores (+384)
- + TMUs (+32)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+1.10 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+29.79 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+46.26 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+0.3)
- + PassMark (overall) (+4298)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+2152)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+4942)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+26041)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+22879)
- + Normalized score (+22.5)
B
GeForce MX350
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+252 MHz)
- + Die size (mm²) (+68 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce GTX 1650
|
Component B
GeForce MX350
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2020 | 2020 |
| VRAM (GB) | 4 GB (+2 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | 1752 MHz (+252 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 128 GB/s (+72 GB/s) | 56 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit (+64 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 50 W (+30 W) | 20 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm (-2 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 4,700M (+1,400M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² | 132 mm² (+68 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1354 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1468 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1,024 (+384) | 640 |
| TMUs | 64 (+32) | 32 |
| ROPs | 32 (+16) | 16 |
| RT cores | — | — |
| Tensor cores | — | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 2.30 TFLOPS (+1.10 TFLOPS) | 1.20 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 53.28 GPixel/s (+29.79 GPixel/s) | 23.49 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 93.24 GTexel/s (+46.26 GTexel/s) | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 26.4 (+0.3) | 26.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 7,116 (+4298) | 2,818 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,488 (+2152) | 1,336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 9,313 (+4942) | 4,371 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 39,153 (+26041) | 13,112 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 36,248 (+22879) | 13,369 |
| Normalized score | 53.3 (+22.5) | 30.8 |
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX350 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 26 FPS | 8 FPS | +225% (A) |
| Anno 1800 | 34 FPS | 19 FPS | +78.9% (A) |
| Apex Legends | 67 FPS | 28 FPS | +139.3% (A) |
| Armored Core 6 | 42 FPS | 10 FPS | +320% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey | 35 FPS | 12 FPS | +191.7% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 21 FPS | 6 FPS | +250% (A) |
| Atomic Heart | 30 FPS | 7 FPS | +328.6% (A) |
| Back 4 Blood | 82 FPS | 29 FPS | +182.8% (A) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 33 FPS | 11 FPS | +200% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 60 FPS | 37 FPS | +62.2% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 36 FPS | 17 FPS | +111.8% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War | 25 FPS | 10 FPS | +150% (A) |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | 51 FPS | 21 FPS | +142.9% (A) |
| Control | 32 FPS | 12 FPS | +166.7% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 131 FPS | 66 FPS | +98.5% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80 FPS | 31 FPS | +158.1% (A) |
| Crysis Remastered | 31 FPS | 9 FPS | +244.4% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 52 FPS | 16 FPS | +225% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | 21 FPS | 7 FPS | +200% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 32 FPS | 6 FPS | +433.3% (A) |
| Darksiders III | 57 FPS | 31 FPS | +83.9% (A) |
| Days Gone | 56 FPS | 24 FPS | +133.3% (A) |
| Dead Island 2 | 50 FPS | 21 FPS | +138.1% (A) |
| Death Stranding | 57 FPS | 17 FPS | +235.3% (A) |
| Deathloop | 37 FPS | 7 FPS | +428.6% (A) |
| Diablo 4 | 72 FPS | 27 FPS | +166.7% (A) |
| Dirt 5 | 35 FPS | 7 FPS | +400% (A) |
| Dirt Rally 2.0 | 69 FPS | 34 FPS | +102.9% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 96 FPS | 83 FPS | +15.7% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 51 FPS | 15 FPS | +240% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 80 FPS | 32 FPS | +150% (A) |
| F1 2019 | 70 FPS | 28 FPS | +150% (A) |
| F1 2020 | 69 FPS | 33 FPS | +109.1% (A) |
| F1 2021 | 77 FPS | 31 FPS | +148.4% (A) |
| F1 22 | 74 FPS | 20 FPS | +270% (A) |
| F1 23 | 66 FPS | 14 FPS | +371.4% (A) |
| FIFA 20 | 148 FPS | 46 FPS | +221.7% (A) |
| FIFA 21 | 120 FPS | 88 FPS | +36.4% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 60 FPS | 27 FPS | +122.2% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 47 FPS | 11 FPS | +327.3% (A) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 44 FPS | 25 FPS | +76% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 19 | 98 FPS | 49 FPS | +100% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 77 FPS | 32 FPS | +140.6% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 32 FPS | 11 FPS | +190.9% (A) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 26 FPS | 9 FPS | +188.9% (A) |
| Fortnite | 90 FPS | 82 FPS | +9.8% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 82 FPS | 37 FPS | +121.6% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 73 FPS | 25 FPS | +192% (A) |
| GRID 2019 | 52 FPS | 18 FPS | +188.9% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 76 FPS | 25 FPS | +204% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 68 FPS | 46 FPS | +47.8% (A) |
| Gears Tactics | 61 FPS | 30 FPS | +103.3% (A) |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint | 44 FPS | 15 FPS | +193.3% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 53 FPS | 15 FPS | +253.3% (A) |
| Hitman 2 | 60 FPS | 20 FPS | +200% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 55 FPS | 19 FPS | +189.5% (A) |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 41 FPS | 12 FPS | +241.7% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 46 FPS | 21 FPS | +119% (A) |
| Immortals Fenyx Rising | 25 FPS | 10 FPS | +150% (A) |
| Just Cause 4 | 56 FPS | 26 FPS | +115.4% (A) |
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance | 53 FPS | 23 FPS | +130.4% (A) |
| Lies of P | 47 FPS | 19 FPS | +147.4% (A) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 43 FPS | 19 FPS | +126.3% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 33 FPS | 12 FPS | +175% (A) |
| Monster Hunter Stories 2 | 107 FPS | 57 FPS | +87.7% (A) |
| Monster Hunter World | 51 FPS | 21 FPS | +142.9% (A) |
| Need for Speed Heat | 51 FPS | 23 FPS | +121.7% (A) |
| Outriders | 54 FPS | 22 FPS | +145.5% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rage 2 | 46 FPS | 15 FPS | +206.7% (A) |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 69 FPS | 18 FPS | +283.3% (A) |
| Ready or Not | 64 FPS | 32 FPS | +100% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 46 FPS | 18 FPS | +155.6% (A) |
| Resident Evil Village | 64 FPS | 14 FPS | +357.1% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 46 FPS | 15 FPS | +206.7% (A) |
| Rocket League | 96 FPS | 67 FPS | +43.3% (A) |
| Serious Sam 4 | 41 FPS | 4 FPS | +925% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 59 FPS | 25 FPS | +136% (A) |
| Sons of the Forest | 32 FPS | 13 FPS | +146.2% (A) |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | 60 FPS | 19 FPS | +215.8% (A) |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 89 FPS | 50 FPS | +78% (A) |
| The Callisto Protocol | 53 FPS | 10 FPS | +430% (A) |
| The Division 2 | 46 FPS | 20 FPS | +130% (A) |
| The Finals | 60 FPS | 17 FPS | +252.9% (A) |
| The Quarry | 34 FPS | 11 FPS | +209.1% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 62 FPS | 27 FPS | +129.6% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 45 FPS | 21 FPS | +114.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 20 FPS | 7 FPS | +185.7% (A) |
| Total War Pharaoh | 53 FPS | 23 FPS | +130.4% (A) |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 39 FPS | 12 FPS | +225% (A) |
| Valorant | 164 FPS | 129 FPS | +27.1% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 77 FPS | 35 FPS | +120% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 39 FPS | 13 FPS | +200% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 45 FPS | 30 FPS | +50% (A) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 38 FPS | 20 FPS | +90% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce GTX 1650 wins 19 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).