Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1050 vs RTX A1000

GeForce GTX 1050 vs RTX A1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1050
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+5508 MHz)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+25 W)
B RTX A1000
  • + Release year (+7)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+112 GB/s)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
  • + CUDA cores (+1536)
  • + TMUs (+24)
  • + ROPs (+8)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+4.52 TFLOPS)
  • + Energy efficiency (+28.9)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+5705)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+36215)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+34678)
  • + Normalized score (+25.9)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1050
Component B
RTX A1000
Release year 2017 2024 (+7)
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 8 GB (+6 GB)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 7008 MHz (+5508 MHz) 1500 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 112 GB/s 224 GB/s (+112 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 75 W (+25 W) 50 W
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 8 nm (-6 nm)
Transistors (M) 3,300M —
Die size (mm²) 132 mm² —
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 768 2,304 (+1536)
TMUs 48 72 (+24)
ROPs 24 32 (+8)
RT cores — 18
Tensor cores — 72
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 2.21 TFLOPS 6.74 TFLOPS (+4.52 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 46.56 GPixel/s —
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 58.20 GTexel/s —
Energy efficiency 11.0 39.9 (+28.9)
PassMark (overall) 5,048 10,753 (+5705)
3DMark Time Spy — —
3DMark Fire Strike 6,068 —
Geekbench OpenCL 17,429 53,644 (+36215)
Geekbench Vulkan 15,766 50,444 (+34678)
Normalized score 31.3 57.2 (+25.9)

Only in component B

DLSS ReBAR

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1050 RTX A1000 Delta
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: RTX A1000 wins 13 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).