Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1050 vs Quadro T1000

GeForce GTX 1050 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1050
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+25 W)
B Quadro T1000
  • + Release year (+2)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+992 MHz)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
  • + Energy efficiency (+13.2)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+1465)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+16421)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+13959)
  • + Normalized score (+14.6)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1050
 Component B
Quadro T1000
Release year 2017 2019 (+2)
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 4 GB (+2 GB)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 7008 MHz 8000 MHz (+992 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 112 GB/s —
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 75 W (+25 W) 50 W
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 12 nm (-2 nm)
Transistors (M) 3,300M —
Die size (mm²) 132 mm² —
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — 1455 MHz
CUDA cores 768 768
TMUs 48 —
ROPs 24 —
RT cores — —
Tensor cores — —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 2.21 TFLOPS —
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 46.56 GPixel/s —
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 58.20 GTexel/s —
Energy efficiency 11.0 24.1 (+13.2)
PassMark (overall) 5,048 6,513 (+1465)
3DMark Time Spy — —
3DMark Fire Strike 6,068 —
Geekbench OpenCL 17,429 33,850 (+16421)
Geekbench Vulkan 15,766 29,725 (+13959)
Normalized score 31.3 45.9 (+14.6)

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1050 Quadro T1000 Delta
Anno 1800 17 FPS 37 FPS 117.6% (B)
Apex Legends 36 FPS 58 FPS 61.1% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 29 FPS 35 FPS 20.7% (B)
Battlefield 5 51 FPS 38 FPS +34.2% (A)
Borderlands 3 23 FPS 38 FPS 65.2% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 36 FPS 51 FPS 41.7% (B)
Control 17 FPS 31 FPS 82.4% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 37 FPS 64 FPS 73% (B)
Dota 2 126 FPS 113 FPS +11.5% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 54 FPS 68 FPS 25.9% (B)
F1 2019 55 FPS 61 FPS 10.9% (B)
FIFA 19 103 FPS 114 FPS 10.7% (B)
FIFA 20 107 FPS 160 FPS 49.5% (B)
Far Cry 5 39 FPS 57 FPS 46.2% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 36 FPS 46 FPS 27.8% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 60 FPS 86 FPS 43.3% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 18 FPS 31 FPS 72.2% (B)
For Honor 42 FPS 64 FPS 52.4% (B)
GRID 2019 34 FPS 65 FPS 91.2% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 66 FPS 94 FPS 42.4% (B)
Gears Tactics 39 FPS 58 FPS 48.7% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 31 FPS 47 FPS 51.6% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 28 FPS 44 FPS 57.1% (B)
Hunt Showdown 28 FPS 44 FPS 57.1% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 31 FPS 41 FPS 32.3% (B)
Metro Exodus 19 FPS 32 FPS 68.4% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 32 FPS 52 FPS 62.5% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 23 FPS 46 FPS 100% (B)
Rainbow Six Siege 57 FPS 112 FPS 96.5% (B)
Red Dead Redemption 2 17 FPS 30 FPS 76.5% (B)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 31 FPS 53 FPS 71% (B)
Rocket League 64 FPS 117 FPS 82.8% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39 FPS 40 FPS 2.6% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 39 FPS 58 FPS 48.7% (B)
The Division 2 30 FPS 36 FPS 20% (B)
The Witcher 3 29 FPS 53 FPS 82.8% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 24 FPS 38 FPS 58.3% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 45 FPS 57 FPS 26.7% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: Quadro T1000 wins 9 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews