Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1050 vs GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce GTX 1050 vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1050
  • + Die size (mm²) (+313 mm²)
B GeForce RTX 2070
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+336 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+5 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+7,500M)
  • + CUDA cores (+1536)
  • + TMUs (+96)
  • + ROPs (+40)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+3.25 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+57.14 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+175.10 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+6.0)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+11015)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+17118)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+71008)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+67642)
  • + Normalized score (+39.2)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1050
Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
Release year 2017 2018 (+1)
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 8 GB (+6 GB)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 7008 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 112 GB/s 448 GB/s (+336 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 256 bit (+128 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 75 W 80 W (+5 W)
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 12 nm (-2 nm)
Transistors (M) 3,300M 10,800M (+7,500M)
Die size (mm²) 132 mm² (+313 mm²) 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz)
Boost clock (MHz)
CUDA cores 768 2,304 (+1536)
TMUs 48 144 (+96)
ROPs 24 64 (+40)
RT cores 36
Tensor cores 288
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 2.21 TFLOPS 5.46 TFLOPS (+3.25 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 46.56 GPixel/s 103.70 GPixel/s (+57.14 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 58.20 GTexel/s 233.30 GTexel/s (+175.10 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 11.0 17.0 (+6.0)
PassMark (overall) 5,048 16,063 (+11015)
3DMark Time Spy 6,661
3DMark Fire Strike 6,068 23,186 (+17118)
Geekbench OpenCL 17,429 88,437 (+71008)
Geekbench Vulkan 15,766 83,408 (+67642)
Normalized score 31.3 70.5 (+39.2)

Only in component B

DLSS

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1050 GeForce RTX 2070 Delta
Anno 1800 17 FPS 69 FPS 305.9% (B)
Anthem 29 FPS 84 FPS 189.7% (B)
Apex Legends 36 FPS 128 FPS 255.6% (B)
Ashes of the Singularity 26 FPS 99 FPS 280.8% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 29 FPS 84 FPS 189.7% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Origins 22 FPS 71 FPS 222.7% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 14 FPS 69 FPS 392.9% (B)
Batman: Arkham Knight 32 FPS 159 FPS 396.9% (B)
Battlefield 1 47 FPS 121 FPS 157.4% (B)
Battlefield 5 51 FPS 92 FPS 80.4% (B)
Borderlands 3 23 FPS 71 FPS 208.7% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 35 FPS 135 FPS 285.7% (B)
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 18 FPS 81 FPS 350% (B)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 36 FPS 113 FPS 213.9% (B)
Civilization 6 39 FPS 130 FPS 233.3% (B)
Control 17 FPS 68 FPS 300% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 65 FPS 150 FPS 130.8% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 24 FPS 60 FPS 150% (B)
Darksiders III 40 FPS 99 FPS 147.5% (B)
Days Gone 32 FPS 101 FPS 215.6% (B)
Death Stranding 30 FPS 115 FPS 283.3% (B)
Destiny 2 50 FPS 170 FPS 240% (B)
Deus Ex Mankind Divided 30 FPS 103 FPS 243.3% (B)
Dirt 4 46 FPS 175 FPS 280.4% (B)
Dirt 5 16 FPS 69 FPS 331.3% (B)
Dirt Rally 88 FPS 200 FPS 127.3% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 37 FPS 117 FPS 216.2% (B)
Dishonored 2 37 FPS 117 FPS 216.2% (B)
Doom 38 FPS 184 FPS 384.2% (B)
Dota 2 126 FPS 127 FPS 0.8% (B)
ELEX 34 FPS 119 FPS 250% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 54 FPS 119 FPS 120.4% (B)
F1 2018 47 FPS 152 FPS 223.4% (B)
F1 2019 55 FPS 139 FPS 152.7% (B)
F1 2020 47 FPS 146 FPS 210.6% (B)
F1 2021 37 FPS 139 FPS 275.7% (B)
FIFA 19 103 FPS 287 FPS 178.6% (B)
FIFA 20 107 FPS 190 FPS 77.6% (B)
FIFA 21 128 FPS 211 FPS 64.8% (B)
Far Cry 5 39 FPS 103 FPS 164.1% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 36 FPS 91 FPS 152.8% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 60 FPS 162 FPS 170% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 18 FPS 77 FPS 327.8% (B)
Flight Simulator 2020 15 FPS 49 FPS 226.7% (B)
For Honor 42 FPS 156 FPS 271.4% (B)
Fortnite 132 FPS 122 FPS +8.2% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 55 FPS 121 FPS 120% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 35 FPS 85 FPS 142.9% (B)
GRID 2019 34 FPS 104 FPS 205.9% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS
GTA V 66 FPS 127 FPS 92.4% (B)
Gears Tactics 39 FPS 115 FPS 194.9% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 31 FPS 89 FPS 187.1% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 28 FPS 99 FPS 253.6% (B)
Hitman 2 31 FPS 86 FPS 177.4% (B)
Hitman 3 32 FPS 124 FPS 287.5% (B)
Horizon Zero Dawn 24 FPS 85 FPS 254.2% (B)
Hunt Showdown 28 FPS 101 FPS 260.7% (B)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 27 FPS 72 FPS 166.7% (B)
Just Cause 4 32 FPS 96 FPS 200% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 31 FPS 97 FPS 212.9% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 27 FPS 90 FPS 233.3% (B)
Metro Exodus 19 FPS 61 FPS 221.1% (B)
Middle-earth: Shadow of War 32 FPS 127 FPS 296.9% (B)
Mirror's Edge Catalyst 40 FPS 131 FPS 227.5% (B)
Monster Hunter World 29 FPS 103 FPS 255.2% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 32 FPS 84 FPS 162.5% (B)
Need for Speed Payback 44 FPS 141 FPS 220.5% (B)
Outriders 27 FPS 94 FPS 248.1% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS
Prey 61 FPS 140 FPS 129.5% (B)
Rage 2 23 FPS 103 FPS 347.8% (B)
Rainbow Six Siege 57 FPS 234 FPS 310.5% (B)
Red Dead Redemption 2 17 FPS 66 FPS 288.2% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24 FPS 65 FPS 170.8% (B)
Resident Evil 7 55 FPS 194 FPS 252.7% (B)
Resident Evil Village 23 FPS 126 FPS 447.8% (B)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 31 FPS 92 FPS 196.8% (B)
Rocket League 64 FPS 247 FPS 285.9% (B)
Serious Sam 4 15 FPS 71 FPS 373.3% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39 FPS 149 FPS 282.1% (B)
Star Wars Battlefront 2 43 FPS 140 FPS 225.6% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 39 FPS 92 FPS 135.9% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 69 FPS 228 FPS 230.4% (B)
The Crew 2 37 FPS 60 FPS 62.2% (B)
The Division 33 FPS 118 FPS 257.6% (B)
The Division 2 30 FPS 94 FPS 213.3% (B)
The Witcher 3 39 FPS 122 FPS 212.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 29 FPS 116 FPS 300% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 24 FPS 89 FPS 270.8% (B)
Valorant 100 FPS 180 FPS 80% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 22 FPS 82 FPS 272.7% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 45 FPS 72 FPS 60% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 27 FPS 96 FPS 255.6% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 2070 wins 19 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).