Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1050 vs GeForce MX350

GeForce GTX 1050 vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1050
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+5256 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+56 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+55 W)
  • + CUDA cores (+128)
  • + TMUs (+16)
  • + ROPs (+8)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+1.02 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+23.07 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+11.22 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+2230)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+1697)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+4317)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+2397)
  • + Normalized score (+0.5)
B GeForce MX350
  • + Release year (+3)
  • + Energy efficiency (+15.2)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1050
 Component B
GeForce MX350
Release year 2017 2020 (+3)
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 2 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 7008 MHz (+5256 MHz) 1752 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 112 GB/s (+56 GB/s) 56 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit (+64 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 75 W (+55 W) 20 W
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 14 nm
Transistors (M) 3,300M 3,300M
Die size (mm²) 132 mm² 132 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — 1354 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) — 1468 MHz
CUDA cores 768 (+128) 640
TMUs 48 (+16) 32
ROPs 24 (+8) 16
RT cores — —
Tensor cores — —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 2.21 TFLOPS (+1.02 TFLOPS) 1.20 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 46.56 GPixel/s (+23.07 GPixel/s) 23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 58.20 GTexel/s (+11.22 GTexel/s) 46.98 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 11.0 26.1 (+15.2)
PassMark (overall) 5,048 (+2230) 2,818
3DMark Time Spy — 1,336
3DMark Fire Strike 6,068 (+1697) 4,371
Geekbench OpenCL 17,429 (+4317) 13,112
Geekbench Vulkan 15,766 (+2397) 13,369
Normalized score 31.3 (+0.5) 30.8

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1050 GeForce MX350 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 16 FPS 8 FPS +100% (A)
Anno 1800 17 FPS 19 FPS 11.8% (B)
Apex Legends 36 FPS 28 FPS +28.6% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 29 FPS 12 FPS +141.7% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 14 FPS 6 FPS +133.3% (A)
Atomic Heart 20 FPS 7 FPS +185.7% (A)
Back 4 Blood 40 FPS 29 FPS +37.9% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 16 FPS 11 FPS +45.5% (A)
Battlefield 5 51 FPS 37 FPS +37.8% (A)
Borderlands 3 23 FPS 17 FPS +35.3% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 18 FPS 10 FPS +80% (A)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 21 FPS 14 FPS +50% (A)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 36 FPS 21 FPS +71.4% (A)
Control 17 FPS 12 FPS +41.7% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 65 FPS 66 FPS 1.5% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 24 FPS 16 FPS +50% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 14 FPS 6 FPS +133.3% (A)
Darksiders III 40 FPS 31 FPS +29% (A)
Days Gone 32 FPS 24 FPS +33.3% (A)
Dead Island 2 34 FPS 21 FPS +61.9% (A)
Death Stranding 30 FPS 17 FPS +76.5% (A)
Diablo 4 44 FPS 27 FPS +63% (A)
Dirt 5 16 FPS 7 FPS +128.6% (A)
Dirt Rally 2.0 37 FPS 34 FPS +8.8% (A)
Dota 2 126 FPS 83 FPS +51.8% (A)
Elden Ring 27 FPS 15 FPS +80% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 54 FPS 32 FPS +68.8% (A)
F1 2019 55 FPS 28 FPS +96.4% (A)
F1 2020 47 FPS 33 FPS +42.4% (A)
F1 2021 37 FPS 31 FPS +19.4% (A)
F1 22 38 FPS 20 FPS +90% (A)
F1 23 36 FPS 14 FPS +157.1% (A)
FIFA 20 107 FPS 46 FPS +132.6% (A)
FIFA 21 128 FPS 88 FPS +45.5% (A)
Far Cry 5 39 FPS 27 FPS +44.4% (A)
Far Cry 6 24 FPS 11 FPS +118.2% (A)
Far Cry New Dawn 36 FPS 25 FPS +44% (A)
Farming Simulator 19 60 FPS 49 FPS +22.4% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 44 FPS 32 FPS +37.5% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 18 FPS 11 FPS +63.6% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 15 FPS 9 FPS +66.7% (A)
Fortnite 132 FPS 82 FPS +61% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 55 FPS 37 FPS +48.6% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 35 FPS 25 FPS +40% (A)
GRID 2019 34 FPS 18 FPS +88.9% (A)
GRID Legends 40 FPS 25 FPS +60% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 66 FPS 46 FPS +43.5% (A)
Gears Tactics 39 FPS 30 FPS +30% (A)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 31 FPS 15 FPS +106.7% (A)
Hitman 2 31 FPS 20 FPS +55% (A)
Hitman 3 32 FPS 19 FPS +68.4% (A)
Horizon Zero Dawn 24 FPS 12 FPS +100% (A)
Hunt Showdown 28 FPS 21 FPS +33.3% (A)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 27 FPS 10 FPS +170% (A)
Just Cause 4 32 FPS 26 FPS +23.1% (A)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 31 FPS 23 FPS +34.8% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 27 FPS 19 FPS +42.1% (A)
Metro Exodus 19 FPS 12 FPS +58.3% (A)
Monster Hunter Stories 2 72 FPS 57 FPS +26.3% (A)
Monster Hunter World 29 FPS 21 FPS +38.1% (A)
Need for Speed Heat 32 FPS 23 FPS +39.1% (A)
Outriders 27 FPS 22 FPS +22.7% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 23 FPS 15 FPS +53.3% (A)
Rainbow Six Extraction 36 FPS 18 FPS +100% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24 FPS 18 FPS +33.3% (A)
Resident Evil Village 23 FPS 14 FPS +64.3% (A)
Riders Republic 26 FPS 15 FPS +73.3% (A)
Rocket League 64 FPS 67 FPS 4.7% (B)
Serious Sam 4 15 FPS 4 FPS +275% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39 FPS 25 FPS +56% (A)
Sons of the Forest 21 FPS 13 FPS +61.5% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 39 FPS 19 FPS +105.3% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 69 FPS 50 FPS +38% (A)
The Callisto Protocol 27 FPS 10 FPS +170% (A)
The Division 2 30 FPS 20 FPS +50% (A)
The Quarry 19 FPS 11 FPS +72.7% (A)
The Witcher 3 39 FPS 27 FPS +44.4% (A)
The Witcher 3 29 FPS 21 FPS +38.1% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 32 FPS 7 FPS +357.1% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 19 FPS 8 FPS +137.5% (A)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 24 FPS 12 FPS +100% (A)
Valorant 100 FPS 129 FPS 29% (B)
Vampire Bloodhunt 50 FPS 35 FPS +42.9% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 22 FPS 13 FPS +69.2% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 45 FPS 30 FPS +50% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 27 FPS 20 FPS +35% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce GTX 1050 wins 15 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews