Component comparison

GeForce GTX 1050 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

GeForce GTX 1050 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce GTX 1050
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+5508 MHz)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+152 mm²)
B GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
  • + Release year (+2)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+176 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+5 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+3,300M)
  • + CUDA cores (+768)
  • + TMUs (+48)
  • + ROPs (+24)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+1.89 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+38.40 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+111.70 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+13.9)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+7570)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+8750)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+43482)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+42364)
  • + Normalized score (+32.3)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce GTX 1050
Component B
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Release year 2017 2019 (+2)
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 6 GB (+4 GB)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 7008 MHz (+5508 MHz) 1500 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 112 GB/s 288 GB/s (+176 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 192 bit (+64 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 75 W 80 W (+5 W)
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 12 nm (-2 nm)
Transistors (M) 3,300M 6,600M (+3,300M)
Die size (mm²) 132 mm² (+152 mm²) 284 mm²
Base clock (MHz)
Boost clock (MHz)
CUDA cores 768 1,536 (+768)
TMUs 48 96 (+48)
ROPs 24 48 (+24)
RT cores
Tensor cores
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 2.21 TFLOPS 4.10 TFLOPS (+1.89 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 46.56 GPixel/s 84.96 GPixel/s (+38.40 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 58.20 GTexel/s 169.90 GTexel/s (+111.70 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 11.0 24.9 (+13.9)
PassMark (overall) 5,048 12,618 (+7570)
3DMark Time Spy 5,659
3DMark Fire Strike 6,068 14,818 (+8750)
Geekbench OpenCL 17,429 60,911 (+43482)
Geekbench Vulkan 15,766 58,130 (+42364)
Normalized score 31.3 63.7 (+32.3)

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 16 FPS 45 FPS 181.3% (B)
Alan Wake Remastered 27 FPS 83 FPS 207.4% (B)
Anno 1800 17 FPS 69 FPS 305.9% (B)
Anthem 29 FPS 73 FPS 151.7% (B)
Apex Legends 36 FPS 102 FPS 183.3% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 29 FPS 69 FPS 137.9% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 14 FPS 49 FPS 250% (B)
Atlas Fallen 26 FPS 74 FPS 184.6% (B)
Atomic Heart 20 FPS 50 FPS 150% (B)
Back 4 Blood 40 FPS 126 FPS 215% (B)
Baldur's Gate 3 16 FPS 54 FPS 237.5% (B)
Battlefield 2042 7 FPS 71 FPS 914.3% (B)
Battlefield 5 51 FPS 111 FPS 117.6% (B)
Borderlands 3 23 FPS 62 FPS 169.6% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 35 FPS 112 FPS 220% (B)
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 18 FPS 68 FPS 277.8% (B)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 36 FPS 88 FPS 144.4% (B)
Company of Heroes 3 31 FPS 52 FPS 67.7% (B)
Control 17 FPS 51 FPS 200% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 65 FPS 147 FPS 126.2% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 24 FPS 86 FPS 258.3% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 14 FPS 54 FPS 285.7% (B)
Darksiders III 40 FPS 75 FPS 87.5% (B)
Days Gone 32 FPS 83 FPS 159.4% (B)
Dead Island 2 34 FPS 86 FPS 152.9% (B)
Dead Space Remake 11 FPS 40 FPS 263.6% (B)
Death Stranding 30 FPS 88 FPS 193.3% (B)
Deus Ex Mankind Divided 30 FPS 79 FPS 163.3% (B)
Diablo 4 44 FPS 113 FPS 156.8% (B)
Dirt 5 16 FPS 56 FPS 250% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 37 FPS 107 FPS 189.2% (B)
Dishonored 2 37 FPS 100 FPS 170.3% (B)
Doom 38 FPS 144 FPS 278.9% (B)
Dota 2 126 FPS 121 FPS +4.1% (A)
Dying Light 2 14 FPS 40 FPS 185.7% (B)
ELEX 34 FPS 90 FPS 164.7% (B)
Elden Ring 27 FPS 57 FPS 111.1% (B)
Elex 2 17 FPS 53 FPS 211.8% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 54 FPS 117 FPS 116.7% (B)
F1 2018 47 FPS 126 FPS 168.1% (B)
F1 2019 55 FPS 121 FPS 120% (B)
F1 2020 47 FPS 122 FPS 159.6% (B)
F1 2021 37 FPS 120 FPS 224.3% (B)
F1 22 38 FPS 117 FPS 207.9% (B)
F1 23 36 FPS 109 FPS 202.8% (B)
FIFA 19 103 FPS 256 FPS 148.5% (B)
FIFA 20 107 FPS 181 FPS 69.2% (B)
FIFA 21 128 FPS 214 FPS 67.2% (B)
Far Cry 5 39 FPS 93 FPS 138.5% (B)
Far Cry 6 24 FPS 78 FPS 225% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 36 FPS 79 FPS 119.4% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 60 FPS 145 FPS 141.7% (B)
Farming Simulator 22 44 FPS 121 FPS 175% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 18 FPS 55 FPS 205.6% (B)
Flight Simulator 2020 15 FPS 39 FPS 160% (B)
For Honor 42 FPS 120 FPS 185.7% (B)
Fortnite 132 FPS 120 FPS +10% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 55 FPS 134 FPS 143.6% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 35 FPS 107 FPS 205.7% (B)
GRID 2019 34 FPS 91 FPS 167.6% (B)
GRID Legends 40 FPS 118 FPS 195% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS
GTA V 66 FPS 124 FPS 87.9% (B)
Gears Tactics 39 FPS 90 FPS 130.8% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 31 FPS 70 FPS 125.8% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 28 FPS 79 FPS 182.1% (B)
God of War 16 FPS 52 FPS 225% (B)
Guardians of the Galaxy 29 FPS 72 FPS 148.3% (B)
Halo Infinite 25 FPS 70 FPS 180% (B)
High On Life 27 FPS 78 FPS 188.9% (B)
Hitman 2 31 FPS 82 FPS 164.5% (B)
Hitman 3 32 FPS 99 FPS 209.4% (B)
Hogwarts Legacy 17 FPS 48 FPS 182.4% (B)
Horizon Zero Dawn 24 FPS 70 FPS 191.7% (B)
Hunt Showdown 28 FPS 69 FPS 146.4% (B)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 27 FPS 59 FPS 118.5% (B)
Just Cause 4 32 FPS 73 FPS 128.1% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 31 FPS 77 FPS 148.4% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 27 FPS 67 FPS 148.1% (B)
Metro Exodus 19 FPS 54 FPS 184.2% (B)
Middle-earth: Shadow of War 32 FPS 89 FPS 178.1% (B)
Mirror's Edge Catalyst 40 FPS 101 FPS 152.5% (B)
Monster Hunter Stories 2 72 FPS 134 FPS 86.1% (B)
Monster Hunter World 29 FPS 82 FPS 182.8% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 32 FPS 80 FPS 150% (B)
Need for Speed Payback 44 FPS 113 FPS 156.8% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 23 FPS 67 FPS 191.3% (B)
New World 28 FPS 56 FPS 100% (B)
Outriders 27 FPS 84 FPS 211.1% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS
Prey 61 FPS 143 FPS 134.4% (B)
Rage 2 23 FPS 70 FPS 204.3% (B)
Rainbow Six Extraction 36 FPS 105 FPS 191.7% (B)
Rainbow Six Siege 57 FPS 201 FPS 252.6% (B)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 16 FPS 40 FPS 150% (B)
Red Dead Redemption 2 17 FPS 51 FPS 200% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24 FPS 75 FPS 212.5% (B)
Resident Evil 7 55 FPS 147 FPS 167.3% (B)
Resident Evil Village 23 FPS 99 FPS 330.4% (B)
Returnal 20 FPS 52 FPS 160% (B)
Riders Republic 26 FPS 55 FPS 111.5% (B)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 31 FPS 86 FPS 177.4% (B)
Rocket League 64 FPS 209 FPS 226.6% (B)
Serious Sam 4 15 FPS 67 FPS 346.7% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39 FPS 114 FPS 192.3% (B)
Sons of the Forest 21 FPS 55 FPS 161.9% (B)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 29 FPS 76 FPS 162.1% (B)
Star Wars Battlefront 2 43 FPS 95 FPS 120.9% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 39 FPS 85 FPS 117.9% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 13 FPS 39 FPS 200% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 69 FPS 159 FPS 130.4% (B)
The Callisto Protocol 27 FPS 81 FPS 200% (B)
The Crew 2 37 FPS 60 FPS 62.2% (B)
The Division 2 30 FPS 78 FPS 160% (B)
The Last of Us 12 FPS 42 FPS 250% (B)
The Quarry 19 FPS 56 FPS 194.7% (B)
The Witcher 3 39 FPS 103 FPS 164.1% (B)
The Witcher 3 29 FPS 93 FPS 220.7% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 32 FPS 43 FPS 34.4% (B)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 19 FPS 67 FPS 252.6% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 24 FPS 64 FPS 166.7% (B)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 17 FPS 51 FPS 200% (B)
Valorant 100 FPS 209 FPS 109% (B)
Vampire Bloodhunt 50 FPS 124 FPS 148% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 22 FPS 71 FPS 222.7% (B)
World of Warships 92 FPS 148 FPS 60.9% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 45 FPS 64 FPS 42.2% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 27 FPS 74 FPS 174.1% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti wins 19 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).