Component comparison

GeForce 940M vs GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce 940M vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce 940M
  • + Die size (mm²) (+297 mm²)
B GeForce RTX 2070
  • + Release year (+3)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+434 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+5 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-16 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+8,930M)
  • + CUDA cores (+1920)
  • + TMUs (+120)
  • + ROPs (+56)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+4.56 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+86.13 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+198.16 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+10.7)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+14930)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+21564)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+82412)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+78859)
  • + Normalized score (+64.3)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce 940M
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
Release year 2015 2018 (+3)
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 8 GB (+6 GB)
Memory type DDR3 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 900 MHz —
Bandwidth (GB/s) 14 GB/s 448 GB/s (+434 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 64 bit 256 bit (+192 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 75 W 80 W (+5 W)
Lithography (nm) 28 nm 12 nm (-16 nm)
Transistors (M) 1,870M 10,800M (+8,930M)
Die size (mm²) 148 mm² (+297 mm²) 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz) 1020 MHz —
Boost clock (MHz) 1098 MHz —
CUDA cores 384 2,304 (+1920)
TMUs 24 144 (+120)
ROPs 8 64 (+56)
RT cores — 36
Tensor cores — 288
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 0.90 TFLOPS 5.46 TFLOPS (+4.56 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 17.57 GPixel/s 103.70 GPixel/s (+86.13 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 35.14 GTexel/s 233.30 GTexel/s (+198.16 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 6.4 17.0 (+10.7)
PassMark (overall) 1,133 16,063 (+14930)
3DMark Time Spy — 6,661
3DMark Fire Strike 1,622 23,186 (+21564)
Geekbench OpenCL 6,025 88,437 (+82412)
Geekbench Vulkan 4,549 83,408 (+78859)
Normalized score 6.2 70.5 (+64.3)

Only in component B

DLSS

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce 940M GeForce RTX 2070 Delta
Anno 1800 7 FPS 69 FPS 885.7% (B)
Ashes of the Singularity 9 FPS 99 FPS 1000% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Origins 10 FPS 71 FPS 610% (B)
Batman: Arkham Knight 12 FPS 159 FPS 1225% (B)
Battlefield 1 15 FPS 121 FPS 706.7% (B)
Battlefield 5 17 FPS 92 FPS 441.2% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Counter-Strike 2 9 FPS 150 FPS 1566.7% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 5 FPS 60 FPS 1100% (B)
Darksiders III 13 FPS 99 FPS 661.5% (B)
Dirt 4 18 FPS 175 FPS 872.2% (B)
Dirt Rally 21 FPS 200 FPS 852.4% (B)
Doom 17 FPS 184 FPS 982.4% (B)
Dota 2 49 FPS 127 FPS 159.2% (B)
ELEX 11 FPS 119 FPS 981.8% (B)
F1 2018 17 FPS 152 FPS 794.1% (B)
F1 2019 18 FPS 139 FPS 672.2% (B)
FIFA 19 34 FPS 287 FPS 744.1% (B)
Far Cry 5 11 FPS 103 FPS 836.4% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 19 FPS 162 FPS 752.6% (B)
For Honor 14 FPS 156 FPS 1014.3% (B)
Fortnite 36 FPS 122 FPS 238.9% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 14 FPS 121 FPS 764.3% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 6 FPS 85 FPS 1316.7% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 14 FPS 127 FPS 807.1% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 10 FPS 99 FPS 890% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 10 FPS 97 FPS 870% (B)
Metro Exodus 2 FPS 61 FPS 2950% (B)
Mirror's Edge Catalyst 12 FPS 131 FPS 991.7% (B)
Need for Speed Payback 13 FPS 141 FPS 984.6% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Siege 20 FPS 234 FPS 1070% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3 FPS 65 FPS 2066.7% (B)
Resident Evil 7 15 FPS 194 FPS 1193.3% (B)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 10 FPS 92 FPS 820% (B)
Rocket League 24 FPS 247 FPS 929.2% (B)
Star Wars Battlefront 2 13 FPS 140 FPS 976.9% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 11 FPS 92 FPS 736.4% (B)
The Crew 2 11 FPS 60 FPS 445.5% (B)
The Division 10 FPS 118 FPS 1080% (B)
The Witcher 3 10 FPS 122 FPS 1120% (B)
The Witcher 3 10 FPS 116 FPS 1060% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 9 FPS 89 FPS 888.9% (B)
Valorant 40 FPS 180 FPS 350% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 2070 wins 19 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews