Component comparison

GeForce 940M vs GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce 940M vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce 940M
  • + Die size (mm²) (+297 mm²)
B GeForce RTX 2060
  • + Release year (+4)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+850 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+322 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-16 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+8,930M)
  • + CUDA cores (+1536)
  • + TMUs (+96)
  • + ROPs (+40)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+5.55 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+63.07 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+166.46 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+11.8)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+12961)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+14709)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+65387)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+61309)
  • + Normalized score (+60.2)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce 940M
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
Release year 2015 2019 (+4)
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 6 GB (+4 GB)
Memory type DDR3 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 900 MHz 1750 MHz (+850 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 14 GB/s 336 GB/s (+322 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 64 bit 192 bit (+128 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 75 W 115 W (+40 W)
Lithography (nm) 28 nm 12 nm (-16 nm)
Transistors (M) 1,870M 10,800M (+8,930M)
Die size (mm²) 148 mm² (+297 mm²) 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz) 1020 MHz —
Boost clock (MHz) 1098 MHz —
CUDA cores 384 1,920 (+1536)
TMUs 24 120 (+96)
ROPs 8 48 (+40)
RT cores — 30
Tensor cores — 240
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 0.90 TFLOPS 6.45 TFLOPS (+5.55 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 17.57 GPixel/s 80.64 GPixel/s (+63.07 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 35.14 GTexel/s 201.60 GTexel/s (+166.46 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 6.4 18.1 (+11.8)
PassMark (overall) 1,133 14,094 (+12961)
3DMark Time Spy — 6,141
3DMark Fire Strike 1,622 16,331 (+14709)
Geekbench OpenCL 6,025 71,412 (+65387)
Geekbench Vulkan 4,549 65,858 (+61309)
Normalized score 6.2 66.4 (+60.2)

Only in component B

DLSS ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce 940M GeForce RTX 2060 Delta
Anno 1800 7 FPS 61 FPS 771.4% (B)
Ashes of the Singularity 9 FPS 64 FPS 611.1% (B)
Battlefield 5 17 FPS 104 FPS 511.8% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Counter-Strike 2 9 FPS 150 FPS 1566.7% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 5 FPS 60 FPS 1100% (B)
Darksiders III 13 FPS 103 FPS 692.3% (B)
Dirt 4 18 FPS 150 FPS 733.3% (B)
Doom 17 FPS 125 FPS 635.3% (B)
Dota 2 49 FPS 118 FPS 140.8% (B)
ELEX 11 FPS 96 FPS 772.7% (B)
F1 2018 17 FPS 103 FPS 505.9% (B)
F1 2019 18 FPS 122 FPS 577.8% (B)
FIFA 19 34 FPS 280 FPS 723.5% (B)
Far Cry 5 11 FPS 96 FPS 772.7% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 19 FPS 151 FPS 694.7% (B)
For Honor 14 FPS 132 FPS 842.9% (B)
Fortnite 36 FPS 162 FPS 350% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 14 FPS 108 FPS 671.4% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 6 FPS 100 FPS 1566.7% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 14 FPS 95 FPS 578.6% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 10 FPS 86 FPS 760% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 10 FPS 83 FPS 730% (B)
Metro Exodus 2 FPS 56 FPS 2700% (B)
Mirror's Edge Catalyst 12 FPS 110 FPS 816.7% (B)
Need for Speed Payback 13 FPS 122 FPS 838.5% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Siege 20 FPS 206 FPS 930% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3 FPS 65 FPS 2066.7% (B)
Resident Evil 7 15 FPS 160 FPS 966.7% (B)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 10 FPS 107 FPS 970% (B)
Rocket League 24 FPS 181 FPS 654.2% (B)
Star Wars Battlefront 2 13 FPS 121 FPS 830.8% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 11 FPS 66 FPS 500% (B)
The Crew 2 11 FPS 60 FPS 445.5% (B)
The Division 10 FPS 101 FPS 910% (B)
The Witcher 3 10 FPS 111 FPS 1010% (B)
The Witcher 3 10 FPS 74 FPS 640% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 9 FPS 67 FPS 644.4% (B)
Valorant 40 FPS 223 FPS 457.5% (B)
World of Warships 37 FPS 129 FPS 248.6% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 2060 wins 20 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews