Component comparison

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Core i5-8250U

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Core i5-8250U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 9 285H
  • + Release year (+8)
  • + Cores (+12)
  • + Threads (+8)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+1.30 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+2.00 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+18 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+30 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-11 nm)
  • + Critical temp (°C) (+10 °C)
  • + Geekbench 5 (single-core) (+1833)
  • + Geekbench 5 (multi-core) (+12794)
  • + Normalized score (+58.6)
B Core i5-8250U

Components are close in specs

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 9 285H
Component B
Core i5-8250U
Release year 2025 (+8) 2017
Cores 16 (+12) 4
Threads 16 (+8) 8
Base clock (GHz) 2.90 GHz (+1.30 GHz) 1.60 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 5.40 GHz (+2.00 GHz) 3.40 GHz
L1 cache (KB) 64 KB
L2 cache (KB) 256 KB
L3 cache (MB) 24 MB (+18 MB) 6 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) 37 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 32 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 45 W (+30 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-11 nm) 14 nm
Critical temp (°C) 110 °C (+10 °C) 100 °C
PassMark (overall) 6,158
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,604 (+1833) 771
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 14,765 (+12794) 1,971
Normalized score 94.5 (+58.6) 35.9

Only in component B

amd_v

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 9 285H wins 12 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).