Component comparison

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Core i5-7200U

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Core i5-7200U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 9 275HX
  • + Release year (+9)
  • + Cores (+22)
  • + Threads (+20)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+0.20 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+2.30 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+33 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-11 nm)
  • + Geekbench 5 (single-core) (+2313)
  • + Geekbench 5 (multi-core) (+16578)
  • + Normalized score (+79.4)
B Core i5-7200U

Components are close in specs

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Component B
Core i5-7200U
Release year 2025 (+9) 2016
Cores 24 (+22) 2
Threads 24 (+20) 4
Base clock (GHz) 2.70 GHz (+0.20 GHz) 2.50 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 5.40 GHz (+2.30 GHz) 3.10 GHz
L1 cache (KB) 64 KB
L2 cache (KB) 256 KB
L3 cache (MB) 36 MB (+33 MB) 3 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) 34 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 32 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 55 W (+40 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-11 nm) 14 nm
Critical temp (°C) 100 °C
PassMark (overall) 3,373
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,821 (+2313) 508
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 17,894 (+16578) 1,316
Normalized score 100.0 (+79.4) 20.6

Only in component B

amd_v

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 9 275HX wins 11 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).