Component comparison

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Core i5-1135G7

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Core i5-1135G7 — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 9 275HX
  • + Release year (+5)
  • + Cores (+20)
  • + Threads (+16)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+1.20 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+1.20 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+28 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
  • + Geekbench 5 (single-core) (+1232)
  • + Geekbench 5 (multi-core) (+13405)
  • + Normalized score (+42.1)
B Core i5-1135G7

Components are close in specs

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Component B
Core i5-1135G7
Release year 2025 (+5) 2020
Cores 24 (+20) 4
Threads 24 (+16) 8
Base clock (GHz) 2.70 GHz (+1.20 GHz) 1.50 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 5.40 GHz (+1.20 GHz) 4.20 GHz
L1 cache (KB) 80 KB
L2 cache (KB) 1,280 KB
L3 cache (MB) 36 MB (+28 MB) 8 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s)
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 64 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 55 W (+40 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-7 nm) 10 nm
Critical temp (°C) 100 °C
PassMark (overall) 9,331
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,821 (+1232) 1,589
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 17,894 (+13405) 4,489
Normalized score 100.0 (+42.1) 57.9

Only in component B

avx512 FMA

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 9 275HX wins 11 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).