Component comparison

Core Ultra 9 185H vs Core Ultra 7 256V

Core Ultra 9 185H vs Core Ultra 7 256V — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 9 185H
  • + Cores (+8)
  • + Threads (+14)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+1.70 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.30 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+12 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+28 W)
  • + Critical temp (°C) (+10 °C)
  • + Geekbench 5 (multi-core) (+2233)
  • + Normalized score (+3.1)
B Core Ultra 7 256V
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + Geekbench 5 (single-core) (+191)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 9 185H
Component B
Core Ultra 7 256V
Release year 2023 2024 (+1)
Cores 16 (+8) 8
Threads 22 (+14) 8
Base clock (GHz) 3.90 GHz (+1.70 GHz) 2.20 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 5.10 GHz (+0.30 GHz) 4.80 GHz
L1 cache (KB)
L2 cache (KB)
L3 cache (MB) 24 MB (+12 MB) 12 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s)
Memory channels
Max memory (GB)
TGP / TDP (W) 45 W (+28 W) 17 W
Lithography (nm) 7 nm 3 nm (-4 nm)
Critical temp (°C) 110 °C (+10 °C) 100 °C
PassMark (overall)
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,217 2,408 (+191)
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 11,833 (+2233) 9,600
Normalized score 87.0 (+3.1) 83.9

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 9 185H wins 9 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).