Component comparison

Core Ultra 7 256V vs Core 3 100U

Core Ultra 7 256V vs Core 3 100U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 7 256V
  • + Cores (+2)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+1.00 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.10 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+2 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+2 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
  • + Normalized score (+38.0)
B Core 3 100U

Components are close in specs

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 7 256V
Component B
Core 3 100U
Release year 2024 2024
Cores 8 (+2) 6
Threads 8 8
Base clock (GHz) 2.20 GHz (+1.00 GHz) 1.20 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 4.80 GHz (+0.10 GHz) 4.70 GHz
L1 cache (KB) 544 KB
L2 cache (KB)
L3 cache (MB) 12 MB (+2 MB) 10 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s)
Memory channels
Max memory (GB)
TGP / TDP (W) 17 W (+2 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-7 nm) 10 nm
Critical temp (°C) 100 °C 100 °C
PassMark (overall) 12,640
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,408
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 9,600
Normalized score 83.9 (+38.0) 46.0

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 7 256V wins 7 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).