Component comparison

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Core Ultra 5 225H

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Core Ultra 5 225H — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 7 255H
  • + Cores (+2)
  • + Threads (+2)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.20 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+6 MB)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
  • + Geekbench 5 (single-core) (+93)
  • + Geekbench 5 (multi-core) (+1557)
  • + Normalized score (+3.3)
B Core Ultra 5 225H
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+2.30 GHz)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 7 255H
Component B
Core Ultra 5 225H
Release year 2025 2025
Cores 16 (+2) 14
Threads 16 (+2) 14
Base clock (GHz) 2.00 GHz 4.30 GHz (+2.30 GHz)
Boost clock (GHz) 5.10 GHz (+0.20 GHz) 4.90 GHz
L1 cache (KB) 112 KB
L2 cache (KB) 2,048 KB
L3 cache (MB) 24 MB (+6 MB) 18 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) 102 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 128 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 28 W 28 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-2 nm) 5 nm
Critical temp (°C) 110 °C 110 °C
PassMark (overall)
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,487 (+93) 2,394
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 13,219 (+1557) 11,662
Normalized score 91.4 (+3.3) 88.0

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 7 255H wins 8 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).