Component comparison

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Core Ultra 5 125U

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Core Ultra 5 125U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 7 255H
  • + Release year (+2)
  • + Cores (+4)
  • + Threads (+2)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+0.70 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.80 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+12 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+13 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + Geekbench 5 (single-core) (+647)
  • + Geekbench 5 (multi-core) (+5649)
  • + Normalized score (+17.1)
B Core Ultra 5 125U

Components are close in specs

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 7 255H
Component B
Core Ultra 5 125U
Release year 2025 (+2) 2023
Cores 16 (+4) 12
Threads 16 (+2) 14
Base clock (GHz) 2.00 GHz (+0.70 GHz) 1.30 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 5.10 GHz (+0.80 GHz) 4.30 GHz
L1 cache (KB) 96 KB
L2 cache (KB) 2 KB
L3 cache (MB) 24 MB (+12 MB) 12 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) 89 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 96 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 28 W (+13 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-4 nm) 7 nm
Critical temp (°C) 110 °C 110 °C
PassMark (overall)
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,487 (+647) 1,840
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 13,219 (+5649) 7,570
Normalized score 91.4 (+17.1) 74.2

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 7 255H wins 11 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).