Component comparison

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Core i5-7200U

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Core i5-7200U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 7 255H
  • + Release year (+9)
  • + Cores (+14)
  • + Threads (+12)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+2.00 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+21 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+13 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-11 nm)
  • + Critical temp (°C) (+10 °C)
  • + Geekbench 5 (single-core) (+1979)
  • + Geekbench 5 (multi-core) (+11903)
  • + Normalized score (+70.8)
B Core i5-7200U
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+0.50 GHz)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 7 255H
Component B
Core i5-7200U
Release year 2025 (+9) 2016
Cores 16 (+14) 2
Threads 16 (+12) 4
Base clock (GHz) 2.00 GHz 2.50 GHz (+0.50 GHz)
Boost clock (GHz) 5.10 GHz (+2.00 GHz) 3.10 GHz
L1 cache (KB) 64 KB
L2 cache (KB) 256 KB
L3 cache (MB) 24 MB (+21 MB) 3 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) 34 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 32 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 28 W (+13 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-11 nm) 14 nm
Critical temp (°C) 110 °C (+10 °C) 100 °C
PassMark (overall) 3,373
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,487 (+1979) 508
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 13,219 (+11903) 1,316
Normalized score 91.4 (+70.8) 20.6

Only in component B

amd_v

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 7 255H wins 11 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).