Component comparison

Core Ultra 5 226V vs Core Ultra 7 255U

Core Ultra 5 226V vs Core Ultra 7 255U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 5 226V
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+2 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
  • + Normalized score (+28.2)
B Core Ultra 7 255U
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Cores (+4)
  • + Threads (+6)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+1.70 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.70 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+4 MB)
  • + Critical temp (°C) (+10 °C)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 5 226V
Component B
Core Ultra 7 255U
Release year 2024 2025 (+1)
Cores 8 12 (+4)
Threads 8 14 (+6)
Base clock (GHz) 2.10 GHz 3.80 GHz (+1.70 GHz)
Boost clock (GHz) 4.50 GHz 5.20 GHz (+0.70 GHz)
L1 cache (KB)
L2 cache (KB)
L3 cache (MB) 8 MB 12 MB (+4 MB)
Bandwidth (GB/s)
Memory channels
Max memory (GB)
TGP / TDP (W) 17 W (+2 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-2 nm) 5 nm
Critical temp (°C) 100 °C 110 °C (+10 °C)
PassMark (overall) 17,902
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,216
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 8,746
Normalized score 80.5 (+28.2) 52.3

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 7 255U wins 7 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).