Component comparison

Core Ultra 5 225H vs Core 3 100U

Core Ultra 5 225H vs Core 3 100U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 5 225H
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Cores (+8)
  • + Threads (+6)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+3.10 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.20 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+8 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+13 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-5 nm)
  • + Critical temp (°C) (+10 °C)
  • + Normalized score (+42.0)
B Core 3 100U
  • + L1 cache (KB) (+432 KB)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 5 225H
Component B
Core 3 100U
Release year 2025 (+1) 2024
Cores 14 (+8) 6
Threads 14 (+6) 8
Base clock (GHz) 4.30 GHz (+3.10 GHz) 1.20 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 4.90 GHz (+0.20 GHz) 4.70 GHz
L1 cache (KB) 112 KB 544 KB (+432 KB)
L2 cache (KB) 2,048 KB
L3 cache (MB) 18 MB (+8 MB) 10 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) 102 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 128 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 28 W (+13 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-5 nm) 10 nm
Critical temp (°C) 110 °C (+10 °C) 100 °C
PassMark (overall) 12,640
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,394
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 11,662
Normalized score 88.0 (+42.0) 46.0

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 5 225H wins 10 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).