Component comparison

Core Ultra 5 125U vs Core Ultra 9 285H

Core Ultra 5 125U vs Core Ultra 9 285H — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 5 125U

Components are close in specs

B Core Ultra 9 285H
  • + Release year (+2)
  • + Cores (+4)
  • + Threads (+2)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+1.60 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+1.10 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+12 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+30 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + Geekbench 5 (single-core) (+764)
  • + Geekbench 5 (multi-core) (+7195)
  • + Normalized score (+20.3)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 5 125U
Component B
Core Ultra 9 285H
Release year 2023 2025 (+2)
Cores 12 16 (+4)
Threads 14 16 (+2)
Base clock (GHz) 1.30 GHz 2.90 GHz (+1.60 GHz)
Boost clock (GHz) 4.30 GHz 5.40 GHz (+1.10 GHz)
L1 cache (KB) 96 KB
L2 cache (KB) 2 KB
L3 cache (MB) 12 MB 24 MB (+12 MB)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 89 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 96 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 15 W 45 W (+30 W)
Lithography (nm) 7 nm 3 nm (-4 nm)
Critical temp (°C) 110 °C 110 °C
PassMark (overall)
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 1,840 2,604 (+764)
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 7,570 14,765 (+7195)
Normalized score 74.2 94.5 (+20.3)

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 9 285H wins 11 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).