Component comparison

Core Ultra 5 125U vs Core 3 100U

Core Ultra 5 125U vs Core 3 100U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 5 125U
  • + Cores (+6)
  • + Threads (+6)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+0.10 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+2 MB)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-3 nm)
  • + Critical temp (°C) (+10 °C)
  • + Normalized score (+28.3)
B Core 3 100U
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.40 GHz)
  • + L1 cache (KB) (+448 KB)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 5 125U
Component B
Core 3 100U
Release year 2023 2024 (+1)
Cores 12 (+6) 6
Threads 14 (+6) 8
Base clock (GHz) 1.30 GHz (+0.10 GHz) 1.20 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 4.30 GHz 4.70 GHz (+0.40 GHz)
L1 cache (KB) 96 KB 544 KB (+448 KB)
L2 cache (KB) 2 KB
L3 cache (MB) 12 MB (+2 MB) 10 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) 89 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 96 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 15 W 15 W
Lithography (nm) 7 nm (-3 nm) 10 nm
Critical temp (°C) 110 °C (+10 °C) 100 °C
PassMark (overall) 12,640
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 1,840
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 7,570
Normalized score 74.2 (+28.3) 46.0

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 5 125U wins 7 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).