Component comparison

Core i5-8250U vs Core Ultra 7 255U

Core i5-8250U vs Core Ultra 7 255U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core i5-8250U

Components are close in specs

B Core Ultra 7 255U
  • + Release year (+8)
  • + Cores (+8)
  • + Threads (+6)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+2.20 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+1.80 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+6 MB)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-9 nm)
  • + Critical temp (°C) (+10 °C)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+11744)
  • + Normalized score (+16.4)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core i5-8250U
Component B
Core Ultra 7 255U
Release year 2017 2025 (+8)
Cores 4 12 (+8)
Threads 8 14 (+6)
Base clock (GHz) 1.60 GHz 3.80 GHz (+2.20 GHz)
Boost clock (GHz) 3.40 GHz 5.20 GHz (+1.80 GHz)
L1 cache (KB) 64 KB
L2 cache (KB) 256 KB
L3 cache (MB) 6 MB 12 MB (+6 MB)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 37 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 32 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 15 W 15 W
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 5 nm (-9 nm)
Critical temp (°C) 100 °C 110 °C (+10 °C)
PassMark (overall) 6,158 17,902 (+11744)
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 771
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 1,971
Normalized score 35.9 52.3 (+16.4)

Only in component A

amd_v

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 7 255U wins 10 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).