Component comparison

Core i5-8250U vs Core 3 100U

Core i5-8250U vs Core 3 100U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core i5-8250U
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+0.40 GHz)
B Core 3 100U
  • + Release year (+7)
  • + Cores (+2)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+1.30 GHz)
  • + L1 cache (KB) (+480 KB)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+4 MB)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+6482)
  • + Normalized score (+10.1)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core i5-8250U
Component B
Core 3 100U
Release year 2017 2024 (+7)
Cores 4 6 (+2)
Threads 8 8
Base clock (GHz) 1.60 GHz (+0.40 GHz) 1.20 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 3.40 GHz 4.70 GHz (+1.30 GHz)
L1 cache (KB) 64 KB 544 KB (+480 KB)
L2 cache (KB) 256 KB
L3 cache (MB) 6 MB 10 MB (+4 MB)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 37 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 32 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 15 W 15 W
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 10 nm (-4 nm)
Critical temp (°C) 100 °C 100 °C
PassMark (overall) 6,158 12,640 (+6482)
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 771
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 1,971
Normalized score 35.9 46.0 (+10.1)

Only in component A

amd_v

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core 3 100U wins 8 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).