Component comparison

Core 3 100U vs Core i5-7200U

Core 3 100U vs Core i5-7200U — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core 3 100U
  • + Release year (+8)
  • + Cores (+4)
  • + Threads (+4)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+1.60 GHz)
  • + L1 cache (KB) (+480 KB)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+7 MB)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+9267)
  • + Normalized score (+25.4)
B Core i5-7200U
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+1.30 GHz)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core 3 100U
Component B
Core i5-7200U
Release year 2024 (+8) 2016
Cores 6 (+4) 2
Threads 8 (+4) 4
Base clock (GHz) 1.20 GHz 2.50 GHz (+1.30 GHz)
Boost clock (GHz) 4.70 GHz (+1.60 GHz) 3.10 GHz
L1 cache (KB) 544 KB (+480 KB) 64 KB
L2 cache (KB) 256 KB
L3 cache (MB) 10 MB (+7 MB) 3 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) 34 GB/s
Memory channels 2
Max memory (GB) 32 GB
TGP / TDP (W) 15 W 15 W
Lithography (nm) 10 nm (-4 nm) 14 nm
Critical temp (°C) 100 °C 100 °C
PassMark (overall) 12,640 (+9267) 3,373
PassMark (single-thread)
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 508
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 1,316
Normalized score 46.0 (+25.4) 20.6

Only in component B

amd_v

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core 3 100U wins 9 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).